Covariance adjustment versus gain scores - revisited

被引:83
作者
Maris, E
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Math Psychol, Nijmegen Inst Cognit Res & Informat Technol, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Educ Measurement, Dept Psychometr, Arnhem, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1082-989X.3.3.309
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There are 2 main ways of estimating the average treatment effect in a 2-group pretest-posttest study: the gain score and the covariance adjustment estimator. The difficulty of the estimation problem arises from the fact that it involves missing posttest data. The gain score and the covariance adjustment estimator both use the pretest to predict these missing data, but in different ways: The gain score estimator treats the pretest as a baseline and the covariance adjustment estimator treats it as a covariate. Using a result by D. B. Rubin (1977), it is shown that, if the assignment is not on the basis of the pretest, there is no basis for preferring the covariance adjustment estimator over the gain score estimator. Contrary to what is sometimes suggested, regression toward the mean is not a reason for not using the gain score estimator; neither is measurement error in the pretest, unless the assignment is affected by the pretest.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 327
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ANAL CHANGE
[2]   RELATION BETWEEN CHANGE AND INITIAL VALUE [J].
BLOMQVIST, N .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1977, 72 (360) :746-749
[3]  
Bloom B., 1964, STABILITY CHANGE HUM
[4]  
BRYK AS, 1977, PSYCHOL BULL, V84, P950
[5]  
BRYK AS, 1976, J EDUC STATIST, V1, P127
[6]   ERRORS OF MEASUREMENT IN STATISTICS [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1968, 10 (04) :637-&
[7]   EFFECTIVENESS OF ADJUSTMENT BY SUBCLASSIFICATION IN REMOVING BIAS IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1968, 24 (02) :295-&
[8]  
COLLINS LM, 1991, BEST METHODS ANAL CH
[9]  
Cox D.R., 1958, Planning of experiments
[10]  
Cronbach L. J., 1977, APTITUDES INSTRUCTIO