Post-pass compaction techniques

被引：14

作者：

De Bus, B ^{[1
]}

Kästner, D

Chanet, D

Van Put, L

De Sutter, B

机构：

[1] Univ Ghent, Elect & Informat Syst Dept, Ghent, Belgium

[2] Univ Saarland, D-6600 Saarbrucken, Germany

来源：

COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM | 2003年 / 46卷 / 08期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1145/859670.859696

中图分类号：

TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

The techniques used in post-pass compaction tools that solve code-size-related programs in program development environments are discussed. The tools are aiPop, Diablo and squeeze++. The techniques consists of whole-program optimizations, elimination of duplicate code fragments in program, and the construction of an internal program representation. The results of whole-program analysis are used during post-pass optimization to remove unnecessary parameter-passing code and redundant register saving code that results from conservative adherence to calling conventions. Additionally, post-pass optimizers reapply standard compiler optimizations, such as peephole optimization, copy propagation, useless code elimination and strength reduction.

引用

页码：41 / 46

页数：6

共 11 条

[1] Sifting out the mud: Low level C++ code reuse [J].

De Sutter, B ;

De Bus, B ;

De Bosschere, K .

ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, 2002, 37 (11) :275-291

[2] Compiler techniques for code compaction [J].

Debray, SK ;

Evans, W ;

Muth, R ;

De Sutter, B .

ACM TRANSACTIONS ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 22 (02) :378-415

[3]

DESUTTER B, 2001, P ACM SIGPLAN WORKSH, P29

[4]

DESUTTER B, 2003, P SIGPLAN S LANG COM

[5]

FERDINAND C, 2001, CONTACT INFINEON TEC

[6]

KASTNER D, 2002, P SIGPLAN JOINT C LA

[7]

KASTNER D, 2001, P 5 INT C OPT TECHN

[8]

LEVINE J, 2000, LINKERS LOADERS

[9]

Muchnick S., 1997, ADV COMPILER DESIGN

[10]

Muth R, 2001, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER, V31, P67, DOI 10.1002/1097-024X(200101)31:1<67::AID-SPE357>3.0.CO

← 1 2 →