Carbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy markets

被引:31
作者
Arroyo-Curras, Tabare [1 ]
Bauer, Nico [1 ]
Kriegler, Elmar [1 ]
Schwanitz, Valeria Jana [1 ]
Luderer, Gunnar [1 ]
Aboumahboub, Tino [1 ]
Giannousakis, Anastasis [1 ]
Hilaire, Jerome [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Climate policy; Copenhagen pledges; Carbon leakage; Fossil energy markets; POLICY; TECHNOLOGY; MITIGATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As a global climate agreement has not yet been achieved, a variety of national climate policy agendas are being pursued in different parts of the world. Regionally fragmented climate policy regimes are prone to carbon leakage between regions, which has given rise to concerns about the environmental effectiveness of this approach. This study investigates carbon leakage through energy markets and the resulting macro-economic effects by exploring the sensitivity of leakage to the size and composition of pioneering regions that adopt ambitious climate action early on. The study uses the multi-regional energy-economy-climate model REMIND 1.5 to analyze the implications of Europe, China and the United States taking unilateral or joint early action. We find that carbon leakage is the combined effect of fossil fuel and capital market re-allocation. Leakage is limited to 15% of the emission reductions in the pioneering regions, and depends on the size and composition of the pioneering coalition and the decarbonization strategy in the energy sector. There is an incentive to delay action to avoid near-term costs, but the immediate GDP losses after acceding to a global climate regime can be higher in the case of delayed action compared to early action. We conclude that carbon leakage is not a strong counter-argument against early action by pioneers to induce other regions to adopt more stringent mitigation. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 203
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, GLOBAL ENERGY ASSESS, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.3049.8724
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, ROADM MOV COMP LOW C
  • [3] Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage
    Babiker, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 65 (02) : 421 - 445
  • [4] Subglobal climate-change actions and carbon leakage: the implication of international capital flows
    Babiker, MH
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2001, 23 (02) : 121 - 139
  • [5] Bauer N., 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE IMPA
  • [6] CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies
    Bauer, Nico
    Bosetti, Valentina
    Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem
    Kitous, Alban
    McCollum, David
    Mejean, Aurelie
    Rao, C. Shilpa
    Turton, Hal
    Paroussos, Leonidas
    Ashina, Shuichi
    Calvin, Katherine
    Wada, Kenichi
    van Vuuren, Detlef
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 90 : 243 - 256
  • [7] The REMIND-R model: the role of renewables in the low-carbon transformation-first-best vs. second-best worlds
    Bauer, Nico
    Baumstark, Lavinia
    Leimbach, Marian
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 114 (01) : 145 - 168
  • [8] Linking energy system and macroeconomic growth models
    Bauer N.
    Edenhofer O.
    Kypreos S.
    [J]. Computational Management Science, 2008, 5 (1-2) : 95 - 117
  • [9] Global impacts of the Kyoto agreement: results from the MS-MRT model
    Bernstein, PM
    Montgomery, WD
    Rutherford, TF
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1999, 21 (3-4) : 375 - 413
  • [10] Blanford Geoffrey J., 2013, CLIM CHANGE IN PRESS