Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment

被引:103
作者
Bhattacharya, Arijit [1 ]
Geraghty, John [1 ]
Young, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Enterprise Proc Res Ctr, Dublin 9, Ireland
关键词
Supplier selection; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); Quality function deployment (QFD); Hierarchical MCDM; CFM; Decision support; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; VENDOR SELECTION; CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS; DECISION-MAKING; EXPERT-SYSTEM; FUZZY-AHP; MODEL; MANAGEMENT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2010.05.025
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A concurrent engineering approach integrating analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with quality function deployment (QFD) in combination with cost factor measure (CFM) has been delineated to rank and subsequently select candidate-suppliers under multiple, conflicting-in-nature criteria environment within a value-chain framework. Engineering requirements and customer requirements governing the selection decision have been identified. The hierarchical QFD methodology allows the decision maker (DM) to rank the candidate-suppliers considering both CFM and the subjective factors. The sensitivity of the proposed methodology is elucidated considering a parameter called objective factor decision weight. The devised methodology has been tested with the dataset adopted from Yahya and Kingsman [89]. Liu and Hai [51] tested their model with the same dataset. A comparative analysis using design of experiment has been elucidated so as to demonstrate the efficacy of the devised hierarchical concurrent engineering approach. (C) 2010 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1027
页数:15
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Akao Y., 2003, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V20, P20, DOI 10.1108/02656710310453791
[2]   AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD - AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION [J].
ARMACOST, RL ;
COMPONATION, PJ ;
MULLENS, MA ;
SWART, WW .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1994, 26 (04) :72-79
[3]  
Barbarosoglu G., 1997, Production and Inventory Management Journal, V38, P14
[4]  
Barla S. B., 2003, Logistics Information Management, V16, P451, DOI 10.1108/09576050310503420
[5]   Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions [J].
Bayazit, Ozden .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2006, 13 (05) :566-+
[6]  
Bayazit Ozden., 2005, ISAHP 2005, P1
[7]   A fuzzy approach method for supplier selection [J].
Bayrak, M. Y. ;
Celebi, N. ;
Taskin, H. .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2007, 18 (01) :54-63
[8]  
BEI W, 2006, INT C SERV SYST SERV, V2, P1439
[9]  
Bevilacqua M., 2006, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V12, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2006.02.001
[10]  
Bevilacqua M., 2002, INT J LOGISTICS, V5, P235, DOI DOI 10.1080/1367556021000026691