Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies:: ROC area, Cohen's d, and r

被引:1251
作者
Rice, ME [1 ]
Harris, GT [1 ]
机构
[1] Mental Hlth Ctr, Penetanguishene, ON L9M 1G3, Canada
关键词
effect size; ROC area; risk assessment; predictive accuracy;
D O I
10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In order to facilitate comparisons across follow-up studies that have used different measures of effect size, we provide a table of effect size equivalencies for the three most common measures: ROC area (AUC), Cohen's d, and r. We outline why AUC is the preferred measure of predictive or diagnostic accuracy in forensic psychology or psychiatry, and we urge researchers and practitioners to use numbers rather than verbal labels to characterize effect sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 620
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1954, BIOMETRIKA TABLES ST
[2]  
Berlin Fred S, 2003, Sex Abuse, V15, P377, DOI 10.1177/107906320301500412
[3]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[4]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[5]   Comparing several robust tests of stochastic equality with ordinally scaled variables and small to moderate sized samples [J].
Delaney, HD ;
Vargha, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (04) :485-503
[6]  
Harris GT, 2003, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V989, P198
[7]   Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients [J].
Hemphill, JF .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2003, 58 (01) :78-79
[8]  
HILTON NZ, 2005, UNPUB USING CATEGORI
[9]   A COMMON LANGUAGE EFFECT SIZE STATISTIC [J].
MCGRAW, KO ;
WONG, SP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 111 (02) :361-365
[10]   ASSESSING PREDICTIONS OF VIOLENCE - BEING ACCURATE ABOUT ACCURACY [J].
MOSSMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 62 (04) :783-792