Global transfer of management practices across nations and MNC subcultures

被引:24
作者
Lunnan, R [1 ]
Lervik, JEB [1 ]
Traavik, LEM [1 ]
Nilsen, SM [1 ]
Amdam, RP [1 ]
Hennestad, BW [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch Management, Oslo, Norway
来源
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE | 2005年 / 19卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AME.2005.16962916
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Our case shows how a Norwegian Multinational Firm (Norwegian Multi) introduced a new performance management practice. The initial starting point was a "best practice" developed by a U.S. consultancy based on the benchmarking of large global firms. Norwegian Multi chose to remove from this best practice the elements that were seen as most provocative to dominant cultural values. Over time more and more subsidiaries reintroduced elements of the original practice. The management practice we examine performance management (PM)-can be regarded as an extension of the traditional performance appraisal, linking individual performance to corporate strategy.1 Researchers separate calculative PM (focus on individual contributions and rewards) and collaborative PM (focus on creating a partnership culture between employer and employee, for example through competency development).2 In the United States, PM practices contain both calculative and collaborative elements, whereas in Scandinavia the calculative element is downplayed.3 Norwegian firms have had a long tradition of holding annual "planning and development talks." This is, however, a single, once a year event intended to promote good working relations more than a managerial system for evaluating, developing and compensating employees.' We suggest that when introducing a "foreign best practice" into this setting, national values present initial barriers, whereas organizational capabilities and systems are crucial for the final shape of the practice.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 80
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MODERNE ORG TRENDER
[2]  
Collins D., 1998, Organizational change: A sociological perspective
[3]  
Cyert R.M., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
[4]  
Gooderham P., 2003, INT MANAGEMENT CROSS
[5]   Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms [J].
Gooderham, PN ;
Nordhaug, O ;
Ringdal, K .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1999, 44 (03) :507-531
[6]  
KOTTER JP, 1995, HARVARD BUS REV, V73, P59
[7]  
Mabey C., 1995, STRATEGIC HUMAN RESO
[8]   INFLUENCES ON HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES IN MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATIONS [J].
ROSENZWEIG, PM ;
NOHRIA, N .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1994, 25 (02) :229-251
[9]  
Schuler R. S., 1999, Strategic Human Resource Management
[10]   Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm [J].
Szulanski, G .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :27-43