Management of residual mass in advanced seminoma: Results and recommendations from the memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

被引:114
作者
Puc, HS
Heelan, R
Mazumdar, M
Herr, H
Scheinfeld, J
Vlamis, V
Bajorin, DF
Bosl, GJ
Mencel, P
Motzer, RJ
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV,COLL MED,DEPT MED,NEW YORK,NY
[2] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,DEPT MED,DIV SOLID TUMOR ONCOL,GENITOURINARY ONCOL SERV,NEW YORK,NY 10021
[3] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,DEPT MED IMAGING,NEW YORK,NY 10021
[4] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,DEPT SURG,DIV UROL,NEW YORK,NY 10021
[5] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,DEPT BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL,NEW YORK,NY 10021
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.454
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Guidelines for management of postchemotherapy residual moss in patients with advanced seminoma remain controversial. We sought to characterize independent prognostic factor(s) for persistence of tumor to identify patients with a high risk of residual carcinoma. Patients and Methods: One hundred four patients with advanced seminoma were assessed. All had achieved a complete response or partial response with normal markers to induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy and had radiographs available for review. Selected prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy characteristics were compared for patients who had either germ cell tumor histology at surgery or relapsed at the assessed site (defined as site failure) versus those who had only necrosis or fibrosis found at surgery and did not relapse at the assessed site (defined as site nonfailure). Results: At a median follow-up time of 47 months (range, 5 to 153), 94 patients (90%) were designated as site nonfailures and 10 (10%) as site failures. Site failure correlated only with size of the residual mass (< 3 cm or normal v greater than or equal to 3 cm; P = .0006). Two of 74 patients (3%) with residual mosses less than 3 cm were considered site failures, compared with eight of 30 (27%) with residual masses greater than or equal to 3 cm. Conclusion: Patients with advanced seminoma who have normal radiographs or residual masses less than 3 cm after chemotherapy can be observed without further intervention. The following three options exist for patients with a residual mass greater than or equal to 3 cm: observation, radiotherapy, or surgical intervention. We prefer the latter to define response, resect viable tumor when possible, and direct further treatment. (C) 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 460
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   DANGERS OF USING OPTIMAL CUTPOINTS IN THE EVALUATION OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
LAUSEN, B ;
SAUERBREI, W ;
SCHUMACHER, M .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (11) :829-835
[2]   RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ETOPOSIDE AND CISPLATIN VERSUS ETOPOSIDE AND CARBOPLATIN IN PATIENTS WITH GOOD-RISK GERM-CELL TUMORS - A MULTIINSTITUTIONAL STUDY [J].
BAJORIN, DF ;
SAROSDY, MF ;
PFISTER, DG ;
MAZUMDAR, M ;
MOTZER, RJ ;
SCHER, HI ;
GELLER, NL ;
FAIR, WR ;
HERR, H ;
SOGANI, P ;
SHEINFELD, J ;
RUSSO, P ;
VLAMIS, V ;
CAREY, R ;
VOGELZANG, NJ ;
CRAWFORD, ED ;
BOSL, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (04) :598-606
[3]   TREATMENT OF TESTICULAR CANCER AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECONDARY MALIGNANCIES [J].
BOKEMEYER, C ;
SCHMOLL, HJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (01) :283-292
[4]  
BOSL GJ, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P3524
[5]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ETOPOSIDE + CISPLATIN VERSUS VINBLASTINE + BLEOMYCIN + CISPLATIN + CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE + DACTINOMYCIN IN PATIENTS WITH GOOD-PROGNOSIS GERM-CELL TUMORS [J].
BOSL, GJ ;
GELLER, NL ;
BAJORIN, D ;
LEITNER, SP ;
YAGODA, A ;
GOLBEY, RB ;
SCHER, H ;
VOGELZANG, NJ ;
AUMAN, J ;
CAREY, R ;
FAIR, WR ;
HERR, H ;
MORSE, M ;
SOGANI, P ;
WHITMORE, W .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (08) :1231-1238
[6]   EVALUATION OF OPTIMAL DURATION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN FAVORABLE-PROGNOSIS DISSEMINATED GERM-CELL TUMORS - A SOUTHEASTERN-CANCER-STUDY-GROUP PROTOCOL [J].
EINHORN, LH ;
WILLIAMS, SD ;
LOEHRER, PJ ;
BIRCH, R ;
DRASGA, R ;
OMURA, G ;
GRECO, FA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (03) :387-391
[7]   TREATMENT OF THE RESIDUAL RETROPERITONEAL MASS AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED SEMINOMA [J].
ELLISON, MF ;
MOSTOFI, FK ;
FLANIGAN, RC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 140 (03) :618-620
[8]   CHEMOTHERAPY OF ADVANCED SEMINOMA - CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF RADIOLOGICAL FINDINGS BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT [J].
FOSSA, SD ;
KULLMANN, G ;
LIEN, HH ;
STENWIG, AE ;
OUS, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 64 (05) :530-534
[9]   THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED METASTATIC SEMINOMA - EXPERIENCE IN 55 CASES [J].
FOSSA, SD ;
BORGE, L ;
AASS, N ;
JOHANNESSEN, NB ;
STENWIG, AE ;
KAALHUS, O .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (07) :1071-1077
[10]   THERAPEUTIC GUIDELINES AND RESULTS IN ADVANCED SEMINOMA [J].
FRIEDMAN, EL ;
GARNICK, MB ;
STOMPER, PC ;
MAUCH, PM ;
HARRINGTON, DP ;
RICHIE, JP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1985, 3 (10) :1325-1332