Different paths to neo-liberalism? Comparing Australia and New Zealand

被引：30

作者：

Bray, M ^{[1
]}

Walsh, P

机构：

[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Management, Ind Relat & Human Resources Management Grp, Callaghan, NSW, Australia

[2] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Business & Publ Management, Wellington, New Zealand

来源：

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS | 1998年 / 37卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/0019-8676.00092

中图分类号：

F24 [劳动经济];

学科分类号：

020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;

摘要：

Australia and New Zealand are best known for their systems of industrial relations based on compulsory arbitration. However, recent years have seen trends in both countries toward neo-liberalism-trends that represent the end of compulsory arbitration. This paper traces the path taken reward neo-liberalism, the speed of the journey, and the destination reached in both countries. In attempting to explain the differences between them, it is institutional factors-industrial and political-that are given highest priority.

引用

页码：358 / 387

页数：30