On the performance benefits of multihoming route control

被引:31
作者
Akella, Aditya [1 ]
Maggs, Bruce [2 ]
Seshan, Srinivasan [2 ]
Shaikh, Anees [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Comp Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] IBM Corp, TJ Watson Res Ctr, Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA
关键词
multihoming; performance; reliability;
D O I
10.1109/TNET.2007.899068
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Multihoming is increasingly being employed by large enterprises and data centers to extract good performance and reliability from their ISP connections. Multihomed end networks today can employ a variety of route control products to optimize their Internet access performance and reliability. However, little is known about the tangible benefits that such products can offer, the mechanisms they employ and their trade-offs. This paper makes two important contributions. First, we present a study of the potential improvements in Internet round-trip times (RTTs) and transfer speeds from employing multihoming route control. Our analysis shows that multihoming to three or more ISPs and cleverly scheduling traffic across the ISPs can improve Internet RTTs and throughputs by up to 25% and 20%, respectively. However, a careful selection of ISPs is important to realize the performance improvements. Second, focusing on large enterprises, we propose and evaluate a wide-range of route control mechanisms and evaluate their design trade-offs. We implement the proposed schemes on a Linux-based Web proxy and perform a trace-based evaluation of their performance. We show that both passive and active measurement-based techniques are equally effective and could improve the Web response times of enterprise networks by up to 25% on average, compared to using a single ISP. We also outline several "best common practices" for the design of route control products.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 104
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AKELLA A, 2003, P ACM SIGCOMM 2003 K
[2]  
AKELLA A, 2004, P ACM SIGCOMM 2004 P
[3]  
ANDERSEN D, 2005, P 2 NETW SYST DES IM
[4]  
ANDERSEN DG, 2001, P 18 S OP SYST PRINC
[5]  
*EM, NETW EM TESTN
[6]  
ESTAN C, 2002, P ACM SIGCOMM 2002
[7]  
*F5 NETW, 2003, BIG IP LINK CONTR
[8]  
FANG M, 1998, P VLDB 1998 NEW YORK
[9]  
GOLDENBERG D, 2004, P ACM SIGCOMM 2004 P
[10]  
GUO F, 2004, P IEEE INFOCOM HONG