18F-FDG PET for posttherapy assessment of Hodgkin's disease and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma:: A systematic review

被引:111
作者
Terasawa, Teruhiko [1 ]
Nihashi, Takashi [2 ]
Hotta, Tomomitsu [1 ]
Nagai, Hirokazu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org Nagoya Med Ctr, Clin Res Ctr Blood Dis, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Natl Ctr Geriatr & Gerontol, Dept Radiol, Obu City, Japan
关键词
F-18-FDG PET; lymphoma; response assessment; residual disease;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.107.039867
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Although studies have shown that F-18-FDG PET, when used to assess the response of malignant lymphoma after treatment, has a strong ability to predict relapse, its diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice remains unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of F-18-FDG PET in detecting residual disease at the completion of first-line therapy of Hodgkin's disease (HD) and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Methods: We searched relevant articles from 1966 to July 2006 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Biological Abstracts, bibliographies, review articles, and textbooks without language restriction. One assessor (for non-English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Relevant individual patient data or subgroup data were provided by the investigators if they were unavailable from the publications. We estimated summary receiver operating characteristic curves and confidence regions for summary sensitivity and specificity. Results: Nineteen studies consisting of 474 HD and 254 aggressive NHL patients were included. These studies had heterogeneity and suboptimal methodologic quality and reporting. Reported ranges for the sensitivity and specificity of F-18-FDG PET in predicting disease relapse were 0.50-1.00 and 0.67-1.00, respectively, for HD and 0.33-0.77 and 0.82-1.00, respectively, for NHL. These estimates were similar when conventional imaging tests showed a residual mass. For HD studies, the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were similar irrespective of whether a residual mass was detected by conventional tests. Factors explaining the variability of diagnostic estimates were not identified. Conclusion: Although currently available evidence is still limited, F-18-FDG PET seems to have good diagnostic accuracy for assessing residual HD at the completion of first-line treatment. Clinical data on this use of F-18-FDG PET for aggressive NHL are more limited. Prospective studies with a more rigorous research design, conduct, and reporting would more reliably reveal the clinical diagnostic accuracy of this imaging modality.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Limitations of PET for imaging lymphoma
    Barrington, Sally F.
    O'Doherty, Michael J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (Suppl 1) : S117 - S127
  • [2] Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative
    Bossuyt, PM
    Reitsma, JB
    Bruns, DE
    Gatsonis, CA
    Glasziou, PP
    Irwig, LM
    Lijmer, JG
    Moher, D
    Rennie, D
    de Vet, HCW
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [3] The role of PET imaging in lymphoma
    Burton, C
    Ell, P
    Linch, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2004, 126 (06) : 772 - 784
  • [4] What is new in lymphoma?
    Cheson, BD
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2004, 54 (05) : 260 - 272
  • [5] Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
    Cheson, BD
    Horning, SJ
    Coiffier, B
    Shipp, MA
    Fisher, RI
    Connors, JM
    Lister, TA
    Vose, J
    Grillo-López, A
    Hagenbeek, A
    Cabanillas, F
    Klippensten, D
    Hiddemann, W
    Castellino, R
    Harris, NL
    Armitage, JO
    Carter, W
    Hoppe, R
    Canellos, GP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (04) : 1244 - 1253
  • [6] Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma
    Cheson, Bruce D.
    Pfistner, Beate
    Juweid, Malik E.
    Gascoyne, Randy D.
    Specht, Lena
    Horning, Sandra J.
    Coiffier, Bertrand
    Fisher, Richard I.
    Hagenbeek, Anton
    Zucca, Emanuele
    Rosen, Steven T.
    Stroobants, Sigrid
    Lister, T. Andrew
    Hoppe, Richard T.
    Dreyling, Martin
    Tobinai, Kensei
    Vose, Julie M.
    Connors, Joseph M.
    Federico, Massimo
    Diehl, Volker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (05) : 579 - 586
  • [7] Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) for diagnosis of residual mass in patients with lymphoma
    deWit, M
    Bumann, D
    Beyer, W
    Herbst, K
    Clausen, M
    Hossfeld, DK
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 : 57 - 60
  • [8] Dörffel W, 2003, KLIN PADIATR, V215, P139
  • [9] Conventional imaging and 2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography for predicting the clinical outcome of patients with previously treated Hodgkin's disease
    Filmont, JE
    Yap, CS
    Ko, F
    Vranjesevic, D
    Quon, A
    Margolis, DJA
    Safaei, A
    Emmanouilides, C
    Silverman, DHS
    Phelps, ME
    Czernin, J
    [J]. MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 6 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [10] Positron emission tomography scanning in the assessment of patients with lymphoma
    Foo, SS
    Mitchell, PL
    Berlangieri, SU
    Smith, CL
    Scott, AM
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 34 (07) : 388 - 397