Aortic Valve Replacement in the Elderly Determinants of Late Outcome

被引:76
作者
Ashikhmina, Elena A. [1 ]
Schaff, Hartzell V. [1 ]
Dearani, Joseph A. [1 ]
Sundt, Thoralf M., III [1 ]
Suri, Rakesh M. [1 ]
Park, Soon J. [1 ]
Burkhart, Harold M. [1 ]
Li, Zhuo [2 ]
Daly, Richard C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
aorta; risk factors; survival; valves; BIOPROSTHETIC VALVES; MECHANICAL VALVES; FOLLOW-UP; OCTOGENARIANS; CHOICE; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; MANAGEMENT; PROSTHESES; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.987560
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Few data exist on long-term outcomes of elderly patients after aortic valve replacement. We evaluated latest follow-up information for patients >= 70 years of age after aortic valve replacement. Methods and Results-Late overall survival of 2890 consecutive patients >= 70 years of age who underwent aortic valve replacement between January 1993 and December 2007 was reviewed retrospectively, analyzed, and stratified by preoperative and intraoperative variables. Observed 5-, 10-, and 15-year late postoperative survival was lower than generally expected (68%, 34%, and 8% versus 70%, 42%, and 20%, respectively; P < 0.001). Independent predictors of late death included older age, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, stroke, myocardial infarction, immunosuppression, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, implanted pacemaker, lower ejection fraction, hypertension, and New York Heart Association class III or IV. After stratification by age-comorbidity risk score, 10-year survival for the lowest-risk group (n=946 [ 33%]) was similar to expected survival (55% versus 55%; P=0.50), but for the highest-risk group (n=564 [ 20%]), survival was significantly lower than expected (9% versus 26%; P < 0.001). For 229 pairs of propensity-matched patients with mechanical or biological prostheses, survival was not significantly different (67%, 40%, and 19% versus 71%, 45%, and 7% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively; P=0.81). Structural deterioration of bioprostheses occurred in 64 patients (2.4%). Conclusions-Survival of elderly patients after aortic valve replacement is influenced by age and preoperative comorbidities; 33% at lowest risk had overall survival similar to that of an age-and sex-matched general population. There was no sufficient evidence that valve type affected survival. Structural deterioration of aortic bioprostheses was rare. (Circulation. 2011; 124: 1070-1078.)
引用
收藏
页码:1070 / U183
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Accola KD, 2008, J HEART VALVE DIS, V17, P355
[2]   Results of bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement performed with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
Akins, CW ;
Hilgenberg, AD ;
Vlahakes, GJ ;
MacGillivray, TE ;
Torchiana, DF ;
Madsen, JC .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 74 (04) :1098-1106
[3]   Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Stenosis: EAE/ASE Recommendations for Clinical Practice [J].
Baumgartner, Helmut ;
Hung, Judy ;
Bermejo, Javier ;
Chambers, John B. ;
Evangelista, Arturo ;
Griffin, Brian P. ;
Iung, Bernard ;
Otto, Catherine M. ;
Pellikka, Patricia A. ;
Quinones, Miguel .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2009, 22 (01) :1-23
[4]   Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: A decision analysis [J].
Birkmeyer, NJO ;
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Tosteson, ANA ;
Grunkemeier, GL ;
Marrin, CAS ;
O'Connor, GT .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 70 (06) :1946-1952
[5]   ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease [J].
Bonow, Robert O. ;
Carabello, Blase A. ;
Chatterjee, Kanu ;
de Leon, Antonio C., Jr. ;
Faxon, David P. ;
Freed, Michael D. ;
Gaasch, William H. ;
Lytle, Bruce Whitney ;
Nishimura, Rick A. ;
O'Gara, Patrick T. ;
O'Rourke, Robert A. ;
Otto, Catherine M. ;
Shah, Pravin M. ;
Shanewise, Jack S. ;
Smith, Sidney C., Jr. ;
Jacobs, Alice K. ;
Adams, Cynthia D. ;
Anderson, Jeffrey L. ;
Antman, Elliott M. ;
Faxon, David P. ;
Fuster, Valentin ;
Halperin, Jonathan L. ;
Hiratzka, Loren F. ;
Hunt, Sharon A. ;
Lytle, Bruce W. ;
Nishimura, Rick ;
Page, Richard L. ;
Riegel, Barbara .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (05) :E84-E231
[6]   Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: Improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses [J].
Brown, Morgan L. ;
Schaff, Hartzell V. ;
Lahr, Brian D. ;
Mullany, Charles J. ;
Sundt, Thoralf M. ;
Dearani, Joseph A. ;
McGregor, Christopher G. ;
Orszulak, Thomas A. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 135 (04) :878-884
[7]   Outcome after aortic valve replacement in octogenarians [J].
Chiappini, B ;
Camurri, N ;
Loforte, A ;
Di Marco, L ;
Di Bartolomeo, R ;
Marinelli, G .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 78 (01) :85-89
[8]   Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: what are the limits? [J].
Cohn, Lawrence H. ;
Narayanasamy, Narendren .
CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 22 (02) :92-95
[9]  
DAVIS EA, 1996, CIRCULATION S, V94
[10]   Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: Is biologic valve the unique solution? [J].
de Vincentiis, Carlo ;
Kunkl, Alessia B. ;
Trimarchi, Santi ;
Gagliardotto, Piervincenzo ;
Frigiola, Alessandro ;
Menicanti, Lorenzo ;
Di Donato, Marisa .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 85 (04) :1296-1302