Methods for priority setting among clinical preventive services

被引：60

作者：

Maciosek, MV

Coffield, AB

McGinnis, JM

Harris, JR

Caldwell, MB

Teutsch, SM

Atkins, D

Richland, JH

Haddix, H

机构：

[1] Partnership Prevent, Washington, DC 20036 USA

[2] Hlth Partners Res Fdn, Minneapolis, MN USA

[3] Robert Wood Johnson Fdn, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA

[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA

[5] Merck & Co Inc, W Point, PA USA

[6] Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Rockville, MD USA

[7] Amer Coll Prevent Med, Washington, DC USA

[8] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE | 2001年 / 21卷 / 01期

关键词：

cost-benefit analysis; data collection; delivery of health care; economics; healthcare quality; access and evaluation; health priorities; preventive health services; preventive medicine; quality-adjusted life years;

D O I：

10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00309-9

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

Overview: Methods used to compare the value of clinical preventive services based on two criteria-clinically preventable burden (CPB) and cost effectiveness (CE)- are described. A companion article provides rankings of clinical preventive services and discusses its uses for decision-makers; this article focuses on the methods, challenges faced, and solutions. The authors considered all types of data essential to measuring CPB and CE for services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and developed methods essential to ensuring valid comparisons of different services' relative value.

引用

页码：10 / 19

页数：10

共 24 条

[1]

ADAMS P, 1999, VITAL HLTH STAT, V10

[2]

[Anonymous], GUID CLIN PREV SERV

[3] Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services [J].