Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast

被引:172
作者
Hurkmans, CW [1 ]
Borger, JH [1 ]
Pieters, BR [1 ]
Russell, NS [1 ]
Jansen, EPM [1 ]
Mijnheer, BJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Huis, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2001年 / 50卷 / 05期
关键词
target volume delineation; breast cancer; CT-based treatment planning; conformal radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01635-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the intra- and interobserver variation in delineation of the target volume of breast tumors on computed tomography (CT) scans in order to perform conformal radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: The clinical target volume (CTV) of the breast was delineated in CT slices by four ra ration once og sts on our clinically used delineation system. The palpable glandular breast tissue was marked with a lead wire on 6 patients before CT scanning, whereas 4 patients were scanned without a lead wire. The CTV was drawn by each observer on three separate occasions. Planning target volumes (PTVs) were constructed by expanding the CTV by 7 mm in each direction, except toward the skin. The deviation in the PTV extent from the average extent was quantified in each orthogonal direction for each patient to find a possible directional dependence in the observer variations. In addition, the standard deviation of the intra- and interobserver variation in the PTV volume was quantified. For each patient, the common volumes delineated by all observers and the smallest volume encompassing all PTVs were also calculated. Results: The patient-averaged deviations in PTV extent were larger in the posterior (42 mm), cranial (28 mm), a dial (24 mm) directions than in the anterior (6 mm), caudal (15 mm), and lateral (8 mm) directions. The mean intraobserver variation in volume percentage (5.5%, 1 SD) was much smaller than the interobserver variation (17.5%, 1 SD). The average ratio between the common and encompassing volume for the four observers separately was 0.82, 0.74, 0.82, and 0.80. A much lower combined average ratio of 0.43 was found because of the large interobserver variations. For the observer who placed the lead wire, the intraobserver variation in volume was decreased by a factor of 4 on scans made with a lead wire in comparison to scans made without a lead wire. For the other observers, no improvement was seen. Based on these results, an improved delineation protocol was designed. Conclusions: Intra- and especially interobserver variation in the delineation of breast target volume on CT scans can be rattier large. A detailed delineation protocol making use of CT scans with lead wires placed on the skin around the palpable breast by the delineating observer reduces the intraobserver variation. To reduce the interobserver variation, better imaging techniques and pathology studies relating glandular breast tissue to imaging may be needed to provide more information on the extent of the clinical target volume. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1366 / 1372
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Variability of the location of internal mammary vessels and glandular breast tissue in breast cancer patients undergoing routine CT-based treatment planning [J].
Bentel, G ;
Marks, LB ;
Hardenbergh, P ;
Prosnitz, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (05) :1017-1025
[2]   Dosimetric analysis of intact breast irradiation in off-axis planes [J].
Buchholz, TA ;
Gurgoze, E ;
Bice, WS ;
Prestidge, BR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (01) :261-267
[3]   A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation [J].
Chang, SX ;
Deschesne, KM ;
Cullip, TJ ;
Parker, SA ;
Earnhart, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (05) :1305-1314
[4]   3-DIMENSIONAL PHOTON DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS WITH AND WITHOUT LUNG CORRECTIONS FOR TANGENTIAL BREAST INTACT TREATMENTS [J].
CHIN, LM ;
CHENG, CW ;
SIDDON, RL ;
RICE, RK ;
MIJNHEER, BJ ;
HARRIS, JR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 17 (06) :1327-1335
[5]   Evaluation of compensation in breast radiotherapy: A planning study using multiple static fields [J].
Donovan, EM ;
Johnson, U ;
Shentall, G ;
Evans, PM ;
Neal, AJ ;
Yarnold, JR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (03) :671-679
[6]   Practical implementation of compensators in breast radiotherapy [J].
Evans, PM ;
Donovan, EM ;
Fenton, N ;
Hansen, VN ;
Moore, I ;
Partridge, M ;
Reise, S ;
Suter, B ;
Symonds-Tayler, JRN ;
Yarnold, JR .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 49 (03) :255-265
[7]   Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning [J].
Fiorino, C ;
Reni, M ;
Bolognesi, A ;
Cattaneo, GM ;
Calandrino, R .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) :285-292
[8]   Evaluation of irradiated heart volumes in stage I breast cancer patients treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy [J].
Gyenes, G ;
Gagliardi, G ;
Lax, I ;
Fornander, T ;
Rutqvist, LE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (04) :1348-1353
[9]   Intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation of the intact breast [J].
Hong, L ;
Hunt, M ;
Chui, C ;
Spirou, S ;
Forster, K ;
Lee, H ;
Yahalom, J ;
Kutcher, GJ ;
McCormick, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (05) :1155-1164
[10]   Cardiac and lung complication probabilities after breast cancer irradiation [J].
Hurkmans, CW ;
Borger, JH ;
Bos, LJ ;
van der Horst, A ;
Pieters, BR ;
Lebesque, JV ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 55 (02) :145-151