Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects?: Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy

被引:493
作者
Shang, AJ
Huwiler-Müntener, K
Nartey, L
Jüni, P
Dörig, S
Sterne, JA
Pewsner, D
Egger, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, MRC, Hlth Serv Res Collaborat, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Zurich, Dept Pharmacol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] MediX Gen Practice Network, Practice Bruckfeld, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Homoeopathy is widely used, but specific effects of homoeopathic remedies seem implausible. Bias in the conduct and reporting of trials is a possible explanation for positive findings of trials of both homoeopathy and conventional medicine. We analysed trials of homoeopathy and conventional medicine and estimated treatment effects in trials least likely to be affected by bias. Methods Placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy were identified by a comprehensive literature search, which covered 19 electronic databases, reference lists of relevant papers, and contacts with experts. Trials in conventional medicine matched to homoeopathy trials for disorder and type of outcome were randomly selected from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (issue 1, 2003). Data were extracted in duplicate and outcomes coded so that odds ratios below 1 indicated benefit. Trials described as double-blind, with adequate randomisation, were assumed to be of higher methodological quality. Bias effects were examined in funnel plots and meta-regression models. Findings 110 homoeopathy trials and 110 matched conventional-medicine trials were analysed. The median study size was 65 participants (range ten to 1573). 21 homoeopathy trials (19%) and nine (8%) conventional-medicine trials were of higher quality. In both groups, smaller trials and those of lower quality showed more beneficial treatment effects than larger and higher-quality trials. When the analysis was restricted to large trials of higher quality, the odds ratio was 0.88 (95% CI 0.65-1.19) for homoeopathy (eight trials) and 0.58 (0.39-0.85) for conventional medicine (six trials). Interpretation Biases are present in placebo-controlled trials of both homoeopathy and conventional medicine. When account was taken for these biases in the analysis, there was weak evidence for a specific effect of homoeopathic remedies, but strong evidence for specific effects of conventional interventions. This finding is compatible with the notion that the clinical effects of homoeopathy are placebo effects.
引用
收藏
页码:726 / 732
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   STATISTICS NOTES - ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7003) :485-485
[2]   Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review [J].
Di Blasi, Z ;
Harkness, E ;
Ernst, E ;
Georgiou, A ;
Kleijnen, J .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9258) :757-762
[3]   Development of the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL register of controlled clinical trials [J].
Dickersin, K ;
Manheimer, E ;
Wieland, S ;
Robinson, KA ;
Lefebvre, C ;
McDonald, SD .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2002, 25 (01) :38-64
[4]   Meta-analysis - Bias in location and selection of studies [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7124) :61-66
[5]   Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997 - Results of a follow-up national survey [J].
Eisenberg, DM ;
Davis, RB ;
Ettner, SL ;
Appel, S ;
Wilkey, S ;
van Rompay, M ;
Kessler, RC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (18) :1569-1575
[6]   The role of complementary and alternative medicine [J].
Ernst, E .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7269) :1133-1135
[7]  
GOTZSCHE PC, 1993, LANCET, V341, P1533
[8]   METAANALYSIS OF SCREENING AND DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS [J].
HASSELBLAD, V ;
HEDGES, LV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 117 (01) :167-178
[9]   Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) :1539-1558
[10]   Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials - An evaluation of 7 medical areas [J].
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Lau, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (04) :437-443