Born to flip. Exit decisions of entrepreneurial firms in high-tech and low-tech industries

被引:76
作者
Cefis, Elena [2 ,3 ]
Marsili, Orietta [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bergamo, Dep Econ, I-24127 Bergamo, Italy
[3] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Sch Econ, NL-3511 BG Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Mergers and acquisitions; Firm exit; Innovation; Entrepreneurship; SURVIVAL; PERSISTENCE; INNOVATION; DIFFUSION; MARKET; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00191-010-0210-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the way that the exit behavior of entrepreneurial firms is shaped by their innovative capabilities, and the technology environment in which they operate. We distinguish between exit by closing down activity and exit by merger or acquisition (M&A). Using a large sample of Dutch manufacturing firms, we explore the relationship between firm exit, age and innovative capabilities, in high and low innovation intensive industries. We find that for entrepreneurial firms, innovation may go some way towards compensating for the liability of newness, but also makes them more attractive M&A targets. More specifically, entrepreneurial firms in high-tech industries do not seem to improve their chances of survival by innovating; when technological change is rapid, innovation, especially in products, is necessary to participate in the innovation race in an industry, but is not sufficient to guarantee survival. In contrast, in low-tech industries, process innovation is a critical condition for the survival of entrepreneurial firms. In this context, entrepreneurial firms that are able to bring new product ideas, introducing 'exceptional' variations into a stable environment, are most likely to exit by M&A, thereby transferring their knowledge and capabilities to the incumbent firms.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 498
页数:26
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Small firm survival and technological activity [J].
Agarwal, R .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1998, 11 (03) :215-224
[2]   Technological activity and survival of firms [J].
Agarwal, R .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1996, 52 (01) :101-108
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SURVIVAL ANAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], SCI TECHN IND SCOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, SOCIOL METHODOL
[6]  
Audretsch D.B., 1994, REV OFINDUSTRIAL ORG, V9, P41, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01024218
[7]   NEW FIRM SURVIVAL - NEW RESULTS USING A HAZARD FUNCTION [J].
AUDRETSCH, DB ;
MAHMOOD, T .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1995, 77 (01) :97-103
[8]   NEW-FIRM SURVIVAL AND THE TECHNOLOGICAL REGIME [J].
AUDRETSCH, DB .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1991, 73 (03) :441-450
[9]   The Red Queen in organizational evolution [J].
Barnett, WP ;
Hansen, MT .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :139-157
[10]  
Bloodgood J.M., 1996, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V20, P61