Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future

被引:257
作者
Reed, James [1 ,2 ]
Van Vianen, Josh [1 ]
Deakin, Elizabeth L. [3 ]
Barlow, Jos [2 ]
Sunderland, Terry [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor 16000, Indonesia
[2] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
[3] Opus Int Consultants, Majest Ctr, Level 9,100 Willis St,POB 12-343, Wellington, New Zealand
[4] James Cook Univ, Ctr Trop Environm & Sustainabil Sci, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia
关键词
biodiversity conservation; conservation and development trade-offs; food security; integrated management; landscape approach; Sustainable Development Goals; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; TRADE-OFFS; SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT; DEVELOPMENT-PROJECTS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RURAL-DEVELOPMENT; FOOD SECURITY; LIVELIHOODS;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.13284
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Poverty, food insecurity, climate change and biodiversity loss continue to persist as the primary environmental and social challenges faced by the global community. As such, there is a growing acknowledgement that conventional sectorial approaches to addressing often inter-connected social, environmental, economic and political challenges are proving insufficient. An alternative is to focus on integrated solutions at landscape scales or landscape approaches'. The appeal of landscape approaches has resulted in the production of a significant body of literature in recent decades, yet confusion over terminology, application and utility persists. Focusing on the tropics, we systematically reviewed the literature to: (i) disentangle the historical development and theory behind the framework of the landscape approach and how it has progressed into its current iteration, (ii) establish lessons learned from previous land management strategies, (iii) determine the barriers that currently restrict implementation of the landscape approach and (iv) provide recommendations for how the landscape approach can contribute towards the fulfilment of the goals of international policy processes. This review suggests that, despite some barriers to implementation, a landscape approach has considerable potential to meet social and environmental objectives at local scales while aiding national commitments to addressing ongoing global challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:2540 / 2554
页数:15
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]   Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty [J].
Adams, WM ;
Aveling, R ;
Brockington, D ;
Dickson, B ;
Elliott, J ;
Hutton, J ;
Roe, D ;
Vira, B ;
Wolmer, W .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5699) :1146-1149
[2]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[3]  
Agrawal A., 1997, Community in conservation: beyond enchantment and disenchantment, P1
[4]  
Aldrich M, 2007, WWF FORESTS LIFE PRO, P24
[5]   SUSTAINABLE RURAL-DEVELOPMENT IN LATIN-AMERICA - BUILDING FROM THE BOTTOM-UP [J].
ALTIERI, MA ;
MASERA, O .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 7 (02) :93-121
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 00018 KSG, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.257359
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, UN MILL DEV GOALS RE
[8]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, INTERACTIVE GOVERNAN
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STATE FOOD INSECURIT