Two new families of Glomales, Archaeosporaceae and Paraglomaceae, with two new genera Archaeospora and Paraglomus, based on concordant molecular and morphological characters

被引:202
作者
Morton, JB
Redecker, D
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Div Plant & Soil Sci, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Plant & Microbial Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
classification; Glomales; mycorrhizae; phylogeny; rDNA; taxonomy; VAM;
D O I
10.2307/3761615
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Two ancestral clades of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species were discovered from deeply divergent ribosomal DNA sequences. They are classified here as two new families Archaeosporaceae and Paraglomaceae. Each family is phylogenetically distant from each other and from other glomalean families, despite similarities in mycorrhizal morphology and fatty acid profiles. Shared mycorrhizal morphology is not surprising, since it is highly conserved and resolves other taxa in Glomales at both family and suborder levels. At the present, time, each family consists of one genus. Archaeospora (Archaeosporaceae) includes three species forming atypical Acaulospora-like spores from sporiferous saccules. Two of these species are dimorphic, forming Glomus-like spores as well. Paraglomus (Paraglomaceae) consists of two species forming spores indistinguishable from those of Glomus species. Morphological characters once considered unique, such as the sporiferous saccule defining species of Acaulosporaceae, clearly are distributed in phylogenetically distant groups. The simple design of spores of some species in Glomus also masks considerable divergence at the molecular level. It is the combination of DNR sequences, fatty acid profiles, immunological reactions against specific monoclonal antibodies, and mycorrhizal morphology which provides the basis for recognizing Archaeospora and Paraglomus. These results reinforce the value of molecular data sets in providing a clearer understanding of phylogenetic relationships, which in turn can lead Co a more robust taxonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 195
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
AMES R N, 1976, Mycotaxon, V3, P565
[2]  
[Anonymous], MYCOLOGICAL SOC AM N
[3]  
Daniels B. A., 1982, Methods and principles of mycorrhizal research., P29
[4]   Geosiphon pyriforme, a fungus forming endocytobiosis with Nostoc (Cyanobacteria), is an ancestral member of the Glomales: Evidence by SSU rRNA analysis [J].
Gehrig, H ;
Schussler, A ;
Kluge, M .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1996, 43 (01) :71-81
[5]   FATTY-ACID METHYL-ESTER PROFILES FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF GLOMALEAN FUNGI AND THEIR ENDOMYCORRHIZAE [J].
GRAHAM, JH ;
HODGE, NC ;
MORTON, JB .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 61 (01) :58-64
[6]  
GREUTER W, 1994, REG VET, V131
[7]   Integrating phylogenetic analysis and classification in fungi [J].
Hibbett, DS ;
Donoghue, MJ .
MYCOLOGIA, 1998, 90 (03) :347-356
[8]   A MODIFIED PROCEDURE FOR STAINING ROOTS TO DETECT VA-MYCORRHIZAS [J].
KOSKE, RE ;
GEMMA, JN .
MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 92 :486-505
[9]  
MALLOCH D, 1980, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V4, P2113
[10]   GERMINATION OF GLOMUS-MOSSEAE SPORES - PROCEDURE AND ULTRASTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS [J].
MEIER, R ;
CHARVAT, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES, 1992, 153 (04) :541-549