Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention

被引:90
作者
Eimer, M [1 ]
Forster, B [1 ]
Van Velzen, J [1 ]
Prabhu, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Birkbeck Coll, Sch Psychol, London WC1E 7HX, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
attention; spatial; response preparation; event-related brain potentials; somatosensory processing;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.08.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The premotor theory of attention claims that the preparation of goal-directed action and shifts of attention are closely linked, because they are controlled by shared sensorymotor mechanisms. Until now, support for this theory has come primarily from studies demonstrating links between saccade programming and attention shifts. The present event-related brain potential (ERP) study demonstrated that attentional orienting processes are also elicited during the covert preparation of unimanual responses. ERPs were recorded in the interval between a visual response-hand selection cue and a subsequent visual Go/Nogo signal when participants prepared to lift their left or right index finger. Lateralised ERP components elicited during response preparation were very similar to components previously observed during instructed endogenous attention shifts, indicating that analogous attentional orienting processes are activated in both cases. Somatosensory ERP components (P90, N140) were enhanced when task-irrelevant tactile probes were delivered during response preparation to the hand involved in an anticipated response, even when probes were presented well in advance of response execution. These results suggest that attentional shifts are triggered during unimanual response preparation, as predicted by the premotor theory. This link between manual response programming and attention is consistent with the hypothesis that common mechanisms are involved in the control of attention and action. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 966
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex [J].
Andersen, RA ;
Buneo, CA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 25 :189-220
[2]  
ANDERSEN RA, 1987, EXP BRAIN RES, V67, P316
[3]   When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use [J].
Berti, A ;
Frassinetti, F .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (03) :415-420
[4]   Gradients of detection in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space [J].
Butler, BC ;
Eskes, GA ;
Vandorpe, RA .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2004, 42 (03) :346-358
[5]   A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements [J].
Corbetta, M ;
Akbudak, E ;
Conturo, TE ;
Snyder, AZ ;
Ollinger, JM ;
Drury, HA ;
Linenweber, MR ;
Petersen, SE ;
Raichle, ME ;
Van Essen, DC ;
Shulman, GL .
NEURON, 1998, 21 (04) :761-773
[6]   Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism [J].
Deubel, H ;
Schneider, WX .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (12) :1827-1837
[7]   Crossmodal links in endogenous and exogenous spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potential studies [J].
Eimer, M ;
Driver, J .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2001, 25 (06) :497-511
[8]   Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations [J].
Eimer, M ;
van Velzen, J ;
Driver, J .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 14 (02) :254-271
[9]   The spatial distribution of attentional selectivity in touch: evidence from somatosensory ERP components [J].
Eimer, M ;
Forster, B .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 114 (07) :1298-1306
[10]   Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention [J].
Eimer, M ;
Forster, B .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 151 (01) :24-31