A Novel Approach to Citation Normalization: A Similarity-Based Method for Creating Reference Sets

被引:15
作者
Colliander, Cristian [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Sociol, Inforsk, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden
关键词
bibliometrics; citation analysis; FIELD NORMALIZATION; SAMPLE QUANTILES; JOURNALS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/asi.23193
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A similarity-oriented approach for deriving reference values used in citation normalization is explored and contrasted with the dominant approach of utilizing database-defined journal sets as a basis for deriving such values. In the similarity-oriented approach, an assessed article's raw citation count is compared with a reference value that is derived from a reference set, which is constructed in such a way that articles in this set are estimated to address a subject matter similar to that of the assessed article. This estimation is based on second-order similarity and utilizes a combination of 2 feature sets: bibliographic references and technical terminology. The contribution of an article in a given reference set to the reference value is dependent on its degree of similarity to the assessed article. It is shown that reference values calculated by the similarity-oriented approach are considerably better at predicting the assessed articles' citation count compared to the reference values given by the journal-set approach, thus significantly reducing the variability in the observed citation distribution that stems from the variability in the articles' addressed subject matter.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 500
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Calibrating the zoom - a test of Zitt's hypothesis [J].
Adams, Jonathan ;
Gurney, Karen ;
Jackson, Louise .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 75 (01) :81-95
[2]   Field normalized citation rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research funds [J].
Ahlgren, Per ;
Colliander, Cristian ;
Persson, Olle .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 92 (03) :767-780
[3]   Document-document similarity approaches and science mapping: Experimental comparison of five approaches [J].
Ahlgren, Per ;
Colliander, Cristian .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (01) :49-63
[4]  
Anastasiu David C., 2014, 30 IEEE INT C DAT EN
[5]  
[Anonymous], CITATION ANAL RES EV
[6]  
[Anonymous], STUDIES COMPUTATIONA
[7]   Modeling score distributions in information retrieval [J].
Arampatzis, Avi ;
Robertson, Stephen .
INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2011, 14 (01) :26-46
[8]   How good is research really? - Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Marx, Werner .
EMBO REPORTS, 2013, 14 (03) :226-230
[9]   Co-Citation Analysis, Bibliographic Coupling, and Direct Citation: Which Citation Approach Represents the Research Front Most Accurately? [J].
Boyack, Kevin W. ;
Klavans, Richard .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (12) :2389-2404
[10]   BRADFORDS LAW AND BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SCIENCE [J].
BROOKES, BC .
NATURE, 1969, 224 (5223) :953-&