Basic building life cycle calculations to decrease contribution to climate change - Case study on an office building in Sweden

被引:105
作者
Wallhagen, Marita [1 ,2 ]
Glaumann, Mauritz [1 ,2 ]
Malmqvist, Tove [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gavle, Fac Engn & Sustainable Dev, Dept Bldg Energy & Environm Engn, Gavle, Sweden
[2] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Div Environm Strategies Res, Dept Urban Studies, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Building design; Climate change; CO2; emissions; Life cycle tool; Energy use; Materials impact; ENERGY USE; EMBODIED ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.02.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
081407 [建筑环境与能源工程];
摘要
This study examined whether simplified life cycle-based calculations of climate change contributions can provide better decision support for building design. Contributions to climate change from a newly built office building in Gavle, Sweden, were studied from a life cycle perspective as a basis for improvements. A basic climate and energy calculation tool for buildings developed in the European project ENSLIC was used. The study also examined the relative impacts from building material production and building operation, as well as the relative importance of the impact contributions from these two life cycle stages at various conditions. The ENSLIC tool calculates operational energy use and contributions to climate change of a number of optional improvement measures. Twelve relevant improvement measures were tested. The most important measures proved to be changing to CO2 free electricity, changing construction slabs from concrete to wood, using windows with better U-values, insulating the building better and installing low-energy lighting and white goods. Introduction of these measures was estimated to reduce the total contribution to climate change by nearly 50% compared with the original building and the operational energy use by nearly 20% (from 100 to 81 kWh/m(2) yr). Almost every building is unique and situated in a specific context. Making simple analyses of different construction options showed to be useful and gave some unexpected results which were difficult to foresee from a general design experience. This process acts as an introduction to life cycle thinking and highlights the consequence of different material choices (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1863 / 1871
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
Adalberth K., 2001, INT J LOW ENERGY SUS, V2
[2]
[Anonymous], 2008, 1564322008 PREN CEN
[3]
[Anonymous], 2021, ENV SUST PLAST CONST
[4]
[Anonymous], 1996, 1000 SVENSK BYGGTJ
[5]
[Anonymous], BYGG OCH FASTIGHETSS
[6]
Arkitektgruppen i Gavle, 2009, ARK GAVL BYGGL
[7]
BBR (Boverkets Byggregler), 2009, REG BYGG BBR 2008 S
[8]
Blanchard S., 1998, Life Cycle Analysis of a Residential Home in Michigan, P60
[9]
The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings [J].
Blengini, Gian Andrea ;
Di Carlo, Tiziana .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (06) :869-880
[10]
Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy [J].
Blengini, Gian Andrea .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 44 (02) :319-330