Temperature dependence of fitness components in geographical populations of Drosophila melanogaster:: changing the association between size and fitness

被引:32
作者
Bochdanovits, Z [1 ]
De Jong, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Evolutionary Populat Biol, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
'bigger is better'; correlated selection response; life-history traits; temperature induced change in trait association;
D O I
10.1111/j.1095-8312.2003.00271.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Contrary to the conventional wisdom 'bigger is better', evolution at high temperature invariably leads to small individuals in Drosophila melanogaster. Natural selection is known to be responsible, meaning that genotypes that are small because of adaptation to high temperature must have some temperature dependent fitness advantage. In this study we consider both preadult and adult fitness components, and show that large adults from a cold adapted population significantly outperform small adults from a warm adapted population only when tested at low temperature and low larval density. In all other conditions 'bigger is not necessarily better', meaning that environmental influences are capable of altering the association between size and fitness. Yet, 'smaller wasn't better either' under any condition, when considering the overall measure of fitness. Examination of individual fitness components revealed population by temperature interaction in preadult survival; this interaction is potentially capable of explaining the temperature specific advantage of small adult body size. At high temperature, the warm adapted population exhibits superior preadult survival while producing small adults. Geographical variation in adult body size seems to be the result of selection on larval growth and competitive strategies, resulting in alterations in the association between fitness components. (C) 2003 The Linnean Society of London.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 725
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The evolution of body size: What keeps organisms small? [J].
Blanckenhorn, WU .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2000, 75 (04) :385-407
[2]  
Bochdanovits Z, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P1829
[3]   TEMPERATURE-RELATED DIVERGENCE IN EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER .2. CORRELATION BETWEEN FITNESS AND BODY DIMENSIONS [J].
CAVICCHI, S ;
GUERRA, D ;
NATALI, V ;
PEZZOLI, C ;
GIORGI, G .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1989, 2 (04) :235-251
[4]  
Chippindale AK, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P1342, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02016.x
[5]  
COYNE JA, 1987, GENETICS, V117, P727
[6]   GENETIC LATITUDINAL ADAPTATION OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER - NEW DISCRIMINATIVE BIOMETRICAL TRAITS BETWEEN EUROPEAN AND EQUATORIAL AFRICAN POPULATIONS [J].
DAVID, J ;
BOCQUET, C ;
DESCHEEMAEKERLOUIS, M .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1977, 30 (03) :247-255
[7]   Phenotypic plasticity and developmental temperature in Drosophila: Analysis and significance of reaction norms of morphometrical traits [J].
David, JR ;
Gibert, P ;
Gravot, E ;
Petavy, G ;
Morin, JP ;
Karan, D ;
Moreteau, B .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL BIOLOGY, 1997, 22 (06) :441-451
[8]  
DAVID JR, 1983, GENETICS BIOL DROS D, V3, P105
[9]   Analysis of selection on enzyme polymorphisms [J].
Eanes, WF .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1999, 30 :301-326
[10]  
Gilchrist AS, 1999, GENETICS, V153, P1775