The industrial revolution, political transition, and the subsequent decline in inequality in 19th-century Britain

被引:60
作者
Justman, M [1 ]
Gradstein, M
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Econ, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Monaster Ctr Econ Res, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Industrial Revolution; growth; franchise; inequality; political dynamics;
D O I
10.1006/exeh.1999.0713
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Democratization was a key mediating factor linking Britain's first industrial revolution to subsequent reductions in income inequality. Accelerated economic growth, generating a wider distribution of discretionary resources, created incentives for repeated expansions of the franchise, which then led to a progressive shift in legislation. After the Second and Third Reform Acts, income inequality was reduced by successive acts of legislation which provided free public education; strengthened the legal standing of the trade unions; aided the aged, the sick, and the unemployed without abridging their political rights; and replaced regressive indirect taxes with progressive taxes on income, land, and inherited wealth, (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 127
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] ACEMOGLU D, 1996, WHY DID W EXTEND FRA
  • [2] DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS AND ECONOMIC-GROWTH
    ALESINA, A
    RODRIK, D
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (02) : 465 - 490
  • [3] [Anonymous], EC HIST BRITAIN 1700
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1981, BRIT ELECTORAL FACTS
  • [5] REGULATION, REDISTRIBUTION, AND PUBLIC CHOICE
    ARANSON, PH
    ORDESHOOK, PC
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 1981, 37 (01) : 69 - 100
  • [6] Barro RobertJ., 1996, J ECON GROWTH, V1, P1, DOI [10.1007/BF00163340, DOI 10.1007/BF00163340]
  • [7] Baxter R. D., 1868, NATL INCOME UK
  • [8] Benabou R., 1996, Inequality and growth
  • [9] BENDIX R., 1978, KINGS PEOPLE POWER M
  • [10] BILS M, 1997, DOES SCH CAUSE GROWT