Small-dose propofol by continuous infusion does not prevent postoperative vomiting in females undergoing outpatient laparoscopy

被引:25
作者
Scuderi, PE
DAngelo, R
Harris, L
Mims, GR
Weeks, DB
James, RL
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesia, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
[2] Department of Anesthesia, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009, Medical Center Blvd.
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199701000-00013
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that there is a direct prophylactic antiemetic effect of small-dose propofol given-by continuous infusion. Sixty female patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopy under general anesthesia were randomized to receive, in a double-blind fashion, either a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg followed by a constant infusion of 1 mg . kg(-1). h(-1) of propofol or an equivalent volume of 10% Intralipid((R)) (placebo) beginning 30 min before induction of anesthesia and continuing until discharge from Stage I postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Anesthesia was induced and maintained in a standard fashion in all patients. The number of emetic episodes before and after discharge from PACU, nausea scores (11-point numerical scale), and time to discharge were evaluated. No significant differences between Intralipid((R)) and propofol were found for any of the outcome variables tested. While small-dose propofol is an effective adjuvant in reducing chemotherapy-induced emesis, we were unable to demonstrate any beneficial effect of propofol in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting when used as the sole prophylactic medication in this patient population. Propofol may have a synergistic effect when administered with other antiemetics, or the specific antiemetic effect of propofol, if it exists, may be dose-dependent and the dose used in this study was below the efficacy threshold.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 75
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   METOCLOPRAMIDE - PHARMACOLOGY AND CLINICAL-APPLICATION [J].
ALBIBI, R ;
MCCALLUM, RW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1983, 98 (01) :86-95
[2]  
BORGEAT A, 1990, ANESTH ANALG, V71, P511
[3]  
BORGEAT A, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, P539
[4]   ADJUVANT PROPOFOL ENABLES BETTER CONTROL OF NAUSEA AND EMESIS SECONDARY TO CHEMOTHERAPY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
BORGEAT, A ;
WILDERSMITH, O ;
FORNI, M ;
SUTER, PM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1994, 41 (11) :1117-1119
[5]  
BORGEAT A, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V80, P642
[6]   ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF DROPERIDOL AND METOCLOPRAMIDE [J].
COHEN, SE ;
WOODS, WA ;
WYNER, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1984, 60 (01) :67-69
[7]  
DENNISTON PL, 1995, PHYSICIANS GENRX, V11, P1312
[8]   PROPOFOL NITROUS OXIDE VERSUS THIOPENTAL-ISOFLURANE NITROUS OXIDE FOR GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
DOZE, VA ;
SHAFER, A ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (01) :63-71
[9]   THE INFLUENCE OF PROPOFOL ON VOMITING INDUCED BY APOMORPHINE [J].
HVARFNER, A ;
HAMMAS, B ;
THORN, SE ;
WATTWIL, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (05) :967-969
[10]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF OUTCOME AFTER PROPOFOL NITROUS OXIDE OR ENFLURANE NITROUS OXIDE ANESTHESIA IN OPERATIONS OF LONG DURATION [J].
KORTTILA, K ;
OSTMAN, PL ;
FAURE, E ;
APFELBAUM, JL ;
EKDAWI, M ;
ROIZEN, MF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1989, 36 (06) :651-657