Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization

被引:15
作者
Chakraborty, D. P. [1 ]
Yoon, Hong-Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
operating characteristics; lesion localization; search model; IDCA; LROC model;
D O I
10.1118/1.2820902
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In 1996 Swensson published an observer model that predicted receiver operating characteristic (ROC), localization ROC (LROC), free-response ROC (FROC) and alternative FROC (AFROC) curves, thereby achieving "unification" of different observer performance paradigms. More recently a model termed initial detection and candidate analysis (IDCA) has been proposed for fitting computer aided detection (CAD) generated FROC data, and recently a search model for human observer FROC data has been proposed. The purpose of this study was to derive IDCA and the search model based expressions for operating characteristics, and to compare the predictions to the Swensson model. For three out of four mammography CAD data sets all models yielded good fits in the high-confidence region, i.e., near the lower end of the plots. The search model and IDCA tended to better fit the data in the low-confidence region, i.e., near the upper end of the plots, particularly for FROC curves for which the Swensson model predictions departed markedly from the data. For one data set none of the models yielded satisfactory fits. A unique characteristic of search model and IDCA predicted operating characteristics is that the operating point is not allowed to move continuously to the lowest confidence limit of the corresponding Swensson model curves. This prediction is actually observed in the CAD raw data and it is the primary reason for the poor FROC fits of the Swensson model in the low-confidence region. (C) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 445
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ATTENTION
[2]   SATISFACTION OF SEARCH IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY [J].
BERBAUM, KS ;
FRANKEN, EA ;
DORFMAN, DD ;
ROOHOLAMINI, SA ;
KATHOL, MH ;
BARLOON, TJ ;
BEHLKE, FM ;
SATO, Y ;
LU, CH ;
ELKHOURY, GY ;
FLICKINGER, FW ;
MONTGOMERY, WJ .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (02) :133-140
[3]  
BUNCH PC, 1978, J APPL PHOTOGR ENG, V4, P166
[4]   ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search [J].
Chakraborty, D. P. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (14) :3463-3482
[5]   A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm [J].
Chakraborty, D. P. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (14) :3449-3462
[6]   Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data [J].
Chakraborty, Dev ;
Yoon, Hong-Jun ;
Mello-Thoms, Claudia .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (01) :4-18
[7]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS OF FREE-RESPONSE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (FROC) DATA [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :561-568
[8]   FREE-RESPONSE METHODOLOGY - ALTERNATE ANALYSIS AND A NEW OBSERVER-PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENT [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP ;
WINTER, LHL .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) :873-881
[9]  
CHAKRABORTY DP, 2007, P SPIE MED IMAGING I, V6515
[10]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS OF SIGNAL-DETECTION THEORY AND DETERMINATION OF CONFIDENCE INTERVALS - RATING-METHOD DATA [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
ALF, E .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 6 (03) :487-&