Responsiveness to sucrose affects tactile and olfactory learning in preforaging honey bees of two genetic strains

被引:133
作者
Scheiner, R
Page, RE
Erber, J
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Okol & Biol, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Entomol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
honey bee; sucrose responsiveness; associative learning; genetic strains;
D O I
10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00359-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Using sucrose solution as reward, we conditioned preforaging honey bees of two genetic strains to tactile stimuli or to odours. Acquisition, extinction of conditioned responses and discrimination between the conditioned stimuli and alternative tactile or olfactory stimuli were measured. Bees of the two genetic strains were selected for their foraging behaviour. In addition, they differ in their responsiveness to sucrose. To analyse the effects of sucrose perception on learning parameters independent of foraging behaviour, we conditioned preforaging bees of the two strains and compared their performance in tactile and olfactory learning paradigms. In both strains, acquisition in tactile and olfactory conditioning is determined by responsiveness to sucrose. There is no genetic effect on the relationship between responsiveness to sucrose and acquisition. Bees responding to low sucrose concentrations perform better than ones that only respond to higher concentrations. Extinction of conditioned responses correlates with acquisition. Responses to alternative stimuli are independent of responsiveness to sucrose. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ANIM BEHAV, DOI DOI 10.1006/ANBE.1993.1167
[2]   SELECTION ON A HAPLOID GENOTYPE FOR DISCRIMINATION-LEARNING PERFORMANCE - CORRELATION BETWEEN DRONE HONEY-BEES (APIS-MELLIFERA) AND THEIR WORKER PROGENY (HYMENOPTERA, APIDAE) [J].
BENATAR, ST ;
COBEY, S ;
SMITH, BH .
JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 1995, 8 (05) :637-652
[3]  
BRANDES C, 1990, J COMP PHYSIOL A, V166, P545
[4]   TIME-COURSE OF MEMORY FORMATION DIFFERS IN HONEY BEE LINES SELECTED FOR GOOD AND POOR LEARNING [J].
BRANDES, C ;
FRISCH, B ;
MENZEL, R .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1988, 36 :981-985
[5]   Heritable variation for latent inhibition and its correlation with reversal learning in honeybees (Apis mellifera) [J].
Chandra, SBC ;
Hosler, JS ;
Smith, BH .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 114 (01) :86-97
[6]   Tactile motor learning in the antennal system of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) [J].
Erber, J ;
Pribbenow, B ;
Grandy, K ;
Kierzek, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 181 (04) :355-365
[7]   Tactile learning in the honeybee [J].
Erber, J ;
Kierzek, S ;
Sander, E ;
Grandy, K .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 183 (06) :737-744
[8]   FOOD-INDUCED AROUSAL AND NONASSOCIATIVE LEARNING IN HONEYBEES - DEPENDENCE OF SENSITIZATION ON THE APPLICATION SITE AND DURATION OF FOOD STIMULATION [J].
HAMMER, M ;
BRAUN, G ;
MAUELSHAGEN, J .
BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 62 (03) :210-223
[9]  
Kuwabara M., 1957, Journal of the Faculty of Science Hokkaido University Zoology, V13, P458
[10]  
Laloi D, 1999, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V90, P123, DOI 10.1023/A:1003598301272