Monitoring across Sectors: Examining the Effect of Nonprofit and For-Profit Contractor Ownership on Performance Monitoring in State and Local Contracts

被引:43
作者
Amirkhanyan, Anna A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ, Washington, DC USA
关键词
MANAGEMENT CAPACITY; TRANSACTION COSTS; PUBLIC-SECTOR; GOVERNMENT; ACCOUNTABILITY; REFLECTIONS; MUNICIPAL; SERVICES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02202.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
What is the effect of contractors' nonprofit and for-profit ownership on the scope and nature of performance measurement used by government agencies? Quantitative and qualitative data were generated through semistructured interviews administered to a sample of state and local public agencies and private contractors across five jurisdictions. The findings of this study suggest that monitoring officers working with nonprofit rather than for-profit contractors are more likely to rely on qualitative performance data and examine equitable access to services, contractors' reputation, and compliance with industry rules and regulations. Although organizational ownership may not be well understood by practitioners, performance appears to be conceptualized differently across sectors. The author calls for a better understanding of the impact of the identified differences in performance measurement on the effectiveness of contract monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 755
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
ALLISON GT, 1997, CLASSICS PUBLIC ADM, P393
[2]   Privatizing Public Nursing Homes: Examining the Effects on Quality and Access [J].
Amirkhanyan, Anna .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2008, 68 (04) :665-680
[3]   Does the public sector outperform the nonprofit and for-profit sectors? Evidence from a national panel study on nursing home quality and access [J].
Amirkhanyan, Anna A. ;
Kim, Hyun Joon ;
Lambright, Kristina T. .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 27 (02) :326-353
[4]   Collaborative Performance Measurement: Examining and Explaining the Prevalence of Collaboration in State and Local Government Contracts [J].
Amirkhanyan, Anna A. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2009, 19 (03) :523-554
[5]  
[Anonymous], TIME 1114
[6]  
ARENSON KW, 1995, NY TIMES 0623
[7]   Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures [J].
Behn, RD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2003, 63 (05) :586-606
[8]   Performance measurement in US counties: Capacity for reform [J].
Berman, E ;
Wang, XH .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2000, 60 (05) :409-420
[9]   The challenging business of long-term public-private partnerships: Reflections on local experience [J].
Bloomfield, P .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (03) :400-411
[10]  
Bouckaert G., 2002, Public Performance Management Review, V25, P359, DOI DOI 10.1080/15309576.2002.11643672