Membrane-type-1 matrix metalloproteinase, matrix metalloproteinase 2, and tissue inhibitor of matrix proteinase 2 in prostate cancer: identification of patients with poor prognosis by immunohistochemistry

被引:68
作者
Trudel, Dominique [1 ,2 ]
Fradet, Yves [3 ]
Meyer, Francois [4 ]
Harel, Francois [4 ]
Tetu, Bernard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CHUQ, Dept Pathol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[3] CHUQ, Dept Urol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[4] CHUQ, Ctr Rech Cancerol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
prostate; neoplasms; MMPS; immunohistochemistry; disease-free survival;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2007.09.021
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 [病理学与病理生理学];
摘要
Overexpression of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 is associated with poor prognosis in many tumor types. Membrane-type-1 MMP (MMP14) activates MMP2 using pro-MMP2 specific inhibitor, tissue inhibitor of matrix proteinase 2 (TIMP2), as a receptor. We evaluated, by immunohistochemistry on 189 T3N0-2M0 prostate cancer (Pea) cases, the influence of MMP2, MMP14, and TIMP2 expression, individually and in association, on Pea disease-free survival (DFS). We evaluated marker expression separately in cancer, stromal, and benign epithelial (BE) cells according to a percentage scale (0%, 10%, 10%-50%, and >50%). Median follow-up was 4.61 years. In BE cells, there was an inverse relationship between initial prostate-specific antigen serum level and T3 stage with MMP14 expression (P = .003) and between pN stage and TIMP2 expression (P = .04). The most significant results with survival were obtained by dichotomizing the cases between those with less than 10% and at least 10% of cells expressing the marker, the latter category representing overexpression. TIMP2 overexpression in stromal cells was associated with a longer DFS with a hazard ratio of 0.573 (P = .02) for time to recurrence. MMP2 overexpression by BE cells correlated with a shorter DFS using a multivariate trend test (hazard ratio = 1.46, P = .02). Stromal cells expressing less than 10% TIMP2 and MMP2 overexpression was the only combination that was significantly associated with a shorter DFS (log-rank test, P = .0001). This study suggests that MMP 14 is involved mostly in Pea implantation and that MMP2 and TIMP2 expression by reactive stromal cells might be used as predictors of DFS in T3N0-2M0 Pea. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 739
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
MT1-MMP and MMP-2 mRNA expression in human ovarian tumors: Possible implications for the role of desmoplastic fibroblasts [J].
Afzal, S ;
Lalani, EN ;
Poulsom, R ;
Stubbs, A ;
Rowlinson, G ;
Sato, H ;
Seiki, M ;
Stamp, GWH .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1998, 29 (02) :155-165
[2]
Metalloproteinase inhibitors: biological actions and therapeutic opportunities [J].
Baker, AH ;
Edwards, DR ;
Murphy, G .
JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2002, 115 (19) :3719-3727
[3]
Restricted expression of membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase by myofibroblasts adjacent to human breast cancer cells [J].
Bisson, C ;
Blacher, S ;
Polette, M ;
Blanc, JF ;
Kebers, F ;
Desreux, J ;
Tetu, B ;
Rosenbaum, J ;
Foidart, JM ;
Birembaut, P ;
Noel, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 105 (01) :7-13
[4]
BOAG AH, 1994, AM J PATHOL, V144, P585
[5]
New targets for therapy in prostate cancer: Modulation of stromal-epithelial interactions [J].
Chung, LWK ;
Hsieh, CL ;
Law, A ;
Sung, SY ;
Gardner, TA ;
Egawa, M ;
Matsubara, S ;
Zhau, HYE .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (5A) :44-54
[6]
New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression [J].
Egeblad, M ;
Werb, Z .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2002, 2 (03) :161-174
[8]
Regulation of membrane type-matrix metalloproteinases [J].
Hernandez-Barrantes, S ;
Bernardo, M ;
Toth, M ;
Fridman, R .
SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) :131-138
[9]
Hollander M, 1973, Nonparametric Statistical Methods, P11437
[10]
USE OF AVIDIN-BIOTIN-PEROXIDASE COMPLEX (ABC) IN IMMUNOPEROXIDASE TECHNIQUES - A COMPARISON BETWEEN ABC AND UNLABELED ANTIBODY (PAP) PROCEDURES [J].
HSU, SM ;
RAINE, L ;
FANGER, H .
JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1981, 29 (04) :577-580