Effect of a Comprehensive Surgical Safety System on Patient Outcomes.

被引:652
作者
de Vries, Eefje N. [1 ,2 ]
Prins, Hubert A. [6 ]
Crolla, Rogier M. P. H. [7 ]
den Outer, Adriaan J. [8 ]
van Andel, George [5 ]
van Helden, Sven H. [9 ]
Schlack, Wolfgang S. [3 ]
van Putten, M. Agnes [2 ]
Gouma, Dirk J. [1 ]
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W. [4 ]
Smorenburg, Susanne M. [2 ]
Boermeester, Marja A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Qual & Proc Innovat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Surg, Den Bosch, Netherlands
[7] Amphia Hosp, Dept Surg, Breda, Netherlands
[8] Rijnland Hosp, Dept Surg, Leiderdorp, Netherlands
[9] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
AMERICAN-COLLEGE; ADVERSE OUTCOMES; IMPLEMENTATION; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; SURGEONS; COMPLICATIONS; CHECKLIST; EVENTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMsa0911535
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Adverse events in patients who have undergone surgery constitute a large proportion of iatrogenic illnesses. Most surgical safety interventions have focused on the operating room. Since more than half of all surgical errors occur outside the operating room, it is likely that a more substantial improvement in outcomes can be achieved by targeting the entire surgical pathway. Methods: We examined the effects on patient outcomes of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary surgical safety checklist, including items such as medication, marking of the operative side, and use of postoperative instructions. The checklist was implemented in six hospitals with high standards of care. All complications occurring during admission were documented prospectively. We compared the rate of complications during a baseline period of 3 months with the rate during a 3-month period after implementation of the checklist, while accounting for potential confounders. Similar data were collected from a control group of five hospitals. Results: In a comparison of 3760 patients observed before implementation of the checklist with 3820 patients observed after implementation, the total number of complications per 100 patients decreased from 27.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.9 to 28.7) to 16.7 (95% CI, 15.6 to 17.9), for an absolute risk reduction of 10.6 (95% CI, 8.7 to 12.4). The proportion of patients with one or more complications decreased from 15.4% to 10.6% (P<0.001). In-hospital mortality decreased from 1.5% (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0) to 0.8% (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.1), for an absolute risk reduction of 0.7 percentage points (95% CI, 0.2 to 1.2). Outcomes did not change in the control hospitals. Conclusions: Implementation of this comprehensive checklist was associated with a reduction in surgical complications and mortality in hospitals with a high standard of care. (Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR1943.) N Engl J Med 2010;363:1928-37.
引用
收藏
页码:1928 / 1937
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Calculating confidence intervals for the number needed to treat [J].
Bender, R .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2001, 22 (02) :102-110
[2]   Reality check for checklists [J].
Bosk, Charles L. ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary ;
Goeschel, Christine A. ;
Pronovost, Peter J. .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9688) :444-445
[3]   An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design [J].
Brown, C. ;
Hofer, T. ;
Johal, A. ;
Thomson, R. ;
Nicholl, J. ;
Franklin, B. D. ;
Lilford, R. J. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 17 (03) :163-169
[4]   Getting surgery right [J].
Clarke, John R. ;
Johnston, Janet ;
Finley, Edward D. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (03) :395-405
[5]   The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review [J].
de Vries, E. N. ;
Ramrattan, M. A. ;
Smorenburg, S. M. ;
Gouma, D. J. ;
Boermeester, M. A. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 17 (03) :216-223
[6]   Development and validation of the SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist [J].
de Vries, E. N. ;
Hollmann, M. W. ;
Smorenburg, S. M. ;
Gouma, D. J. ;
Boermeester, M. A. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 18 (02) :121-126
[7]   Statistical procedures for analyzing mental health services data [J].
Elhai, Jon D. ;
Calhoun, Patrick S. ;
Ford, Julian D. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2008, 160 (02) :129-136
[8]   Measuring postoperative complications in general surgery patients using an outcomes-based-strategy: Comparison with complications presented at morbidity and mortality rounds [J].
Feldman, L ;
Barkun, J ;
Barkun, A ;
Sampalis, J ;
Rosenberg, L .
SURGERY, 1997, 122 (04) :711-719
[9]   Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients [J].
Greenberg, Caprice C. ;
Regenbogen, Scott E. ;
Studdert, David M. ;
Lipsitz, Stuart R. ;
Rogers, Selwyn O. ;
Zinner, Michael J. ;
Gawande, Atul A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (04) :533-540
[10]   The American College of Surgeons' closed claims study: New insights for improving care [J].
Griffen, F. Dean ;
Stephens, Linda S. ;
Alexander, James B. ;
Bailey, H. Randolph ;
Maizel, Scott E. ;
Sutton, Beth Howell ;
Posner, Karen L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (04) :561-569