Monetary valuation of informal care: The well-being valuation method

被引:106
作者
Van den Berg, Bernard
Ferrer-I-Carbonell, Ada
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, Dept Hlth Econ & Hlth Technol Assessment, Inst Hlth Sci, Fac Earth Sci & Life Sci, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Business, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Evaluat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Amsterdam, AIAS, Fac Econ & Business SCHOLAR, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Tinbergen Inst, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
informal care; subjective well-being; compensating variation; economic evaluations;
D O I
10.1002/hec.1224
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper estimates the monetary value of providing informal care by means of a well-being valuation method. This is done by assessing the compensating variation necessary to maintain the same level of well-being after an informal caregiver provides an extra hour of informal care. The informal caregiver's well-being is proxied by the answer to two subjective well-being questions that were posed in a questionnaire answered by 865 Dutch informal caregivers between the end of 2001 and the beginning of 2002. In the econometric analysis, a distinction is made between the care recipients who are and the ones who are not a family member of the informal caregiver. The results indicate that an extra hour of informal care is worth about 9 or 10 Euros. This equals 8 or 9 Euros if the care recipient is a family member and about 7 or 9 Euros if not. When applying the contingent valuation method to the same sample, the value obtained was 10.52 Euros per hour. This paper concludes that the well-being valuation method is a useful complement to the more traditional valuation methods in the health economics literature in general and more particularly for the economic valuation of informal care: it includes all costs and effects associated with providing care from the perspective of the informal caregiver, it is relatively cheap to implement, and it offers an additional possibility to determine the convergent validity of the different monetary valuation methods. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1244
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine
[2]   Well-being over time in Britain and the USA [J].
Blanchflower, DG ;
Oswald, AJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (7-8) :1359-1386
[3]   A comparison of conjoint analysis response formats [J].
Boyle, KJ ;
Holmes, TP ;
Teisl, MF ;
Roe, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 83 (02) :441-454
[4]   Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring [J].
Brouwer, WBF ;
van Exel, NJA ;
van den Berg, B ;
van den Bos, GAM ;
Koopmanschap, MA .
HEALTH POLICY, 2005, 74 (01) :85-99
[5]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[6]  
CBS, STATL
[7]   UNHAPPINESS AND UNEMPLOYMENT [J].
CLARK, AE ;
OSWALD, AJ .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1994, 104 (424) :648-659
[8]   Testing the convergent validity of the contingent valuation and travel cost methods in valuing the benefits of health care [J].
Clarke, PM .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 11 (02) :117-127
[9]   Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness [J].
Di Tella, R ;
MacCulloch, RJ ;
Oswald, AJ .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (01) :335-341
[10]  
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4