Advances in the management of metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours during the cisplatin era: A single-institution experience

被引:22
作者
Gerl, A
Clemm, C
Schmeller, N
Hartenstein, R
Lamerz, R
Wilmanns, W
机构
[1] UNIV MUNICH,KLINIKUM GROSSHADERN,DEPT UROL,D-81377 MUNICH,GERMANY
[2] UNIV MUNICH,KLINIKUM GROSSHADERN,DEPT INTERNAL MED 2,D-81377 MUNICH,GERMANY
[3] CLIN ONCOL,DEPT INTERNAL MED,BAD TRISSL,GERMANY
[4] MUNICH HARLACHING CITY HOSP,DEPT INTERNAL MED 4,MUNICH,GERMANY
[5] GSF FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM UMWELT & GESUNDHEIT GMBH,MUNICH,GERMANY
关键词
non-seminomatous germ cell tumour; chemotherapy; etoposide; prognosis; second neoplasm;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1996.530
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Long-term outcome was reviewed in 266 consecutive patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell rumours treated at a single institution. The overall 3 year survival was 77%, and 3 year progression free survival was 71%. Multivariate analysis identified the following clinical features as independent prognostic factors: the presence of liver. bone or brain metastasis, serum human chorionic gonadotropin greater than or equal to 10000 U 1(-1) and/or alpha-fetoprotein greater than or equal to 1000 ng ml(-1), a mediastinal mass > 5 cm and the presence of 20 or more lung metastases. Age was not of prognostic significance. Patients without any of the above poor-risk factors had a 3-year survival of 91% regardless of etoposide- or vinblastine-containing chemotherapy compared with 61% for the remaining patients. However, etoposide-containing protocols led to significantly improved survival in patients with at least one poor risk factor. After 612 patient-years of observation no case of secondary leukaemia was observed among 119 surviving patients who had received etoposide as part of their treatment. With a median follow-up of 93 months, five patients developed a second germ cell tumour, two patients nongerm cell malignancies. Fourteen patients relapsed after a disease-free interval of more than 2 years, and nine patients died more than 5 years after commencement of treatment underscoring the need to report long-term results. There is some evidence that cumulative experience translates into improved survival and cure rates for patients with poor-risk metastatic disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1280 / 1285
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN UNSELECTED PATIENTS WITH NONSEMINOMATOUS METASTATIC TESTICULAR CANCER - A MULTICENTER EXPERIENCE [J].
AASS, N ;
KLEPP, O ;
CAVALLINSTAHL, E ;
DAHL, O ;
WICKLUND, H ;
UNSGAARD, B ;
BALDETORP, L ;
AHLSTROM, S ;
FOSSA, SD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (05) :818-826
[2]  
BAJORIN DF, 1993, J NATL CANCER I, V85, P630
[3]   LATE RELAPSE OF TESTICULAR CANCER [J].
BANIEL, J ;
FOSTER, RS ;
GONIN, R ;
MESSEMER, JE ;
DONOHUE, JP ;
EINHORN, LH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (05) :1170-1176
[4]   RISK OF SECONDARY LEUKEMIA FOLLOWING HIGH CUMULATIVE DOSES OF ETOPOSIDE DURING CHEMOTHERAPY FOR TESTICULAR CANCER [J].
BOKEMEYER, C ;
SCHMOLL, HJ ;
KUCZYK, MA ;
BEYER, J ;
SIEGERT, W .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (01) :58-60
[5]  
BOKEMEYER C, 1995, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V14, P230
[6]   SECONDARY TUMORS FOLLOWING ETOPOSIDE CONTAINING THERAPY FOR GERM-CELL CANCER [J].
BOSHOFF, C ;
BEGENT, RHJ ;
OLIVER, RTD ;
RUSTIN, GJ ;
NEWLANDS, ES ;
ANDREWS, R ;
SKELTON, M ;
HOLDEN, L ;
ONG, J .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1995, 6 (01) :35-40
[7]   COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY WITH BLEOMYCIN, ETOPOSIDE AND CISPLATIN (BEP) FOR METASTATIC TESTICULAR TERATOMA - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
DEARNALEY, DP ;
HORWICH, A ;
AHERN, R ;
NICHOLLS, J ;
JAY, G ;
HENDRY, WF ;
PECKHAM, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 27 (06) :684-691
[8]  
Dixon WJ, 1990, BMDP STAT SOFTWARE
[9]   CIS-DIAMMINEDICHLOROPLATINUM, VINBLASTINE, AND BLEOMYCIN COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY IN DISSEMINATED TESTICULAR CANCER [J].
EINHORN, LH ;
DONOHUE, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1977, 87 (03) :293-298
[10]   HAVE NEW AGGRESSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IMPROVED RESULTS IN ADVANCED GERM-CELL TUMORS [J].
EINHORN, LH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 22 (11) :1289-1293