Performance management, evaluation and learning in 'modern' local government

被引:128
作者
Sanderson, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Policy Res Inst, Leeds LS1 3HE, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9299.00257
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Public sector reforms throughout OECD member states are producing a new model of 'public governance' embodying a more modest role for the state and a strong emphasis on performance management, in the UK, the development of performance management in the context of the 'new public management' has been primarily 'top-down' with a dominant concern for enhancing control and 'upwards accountability' rather than promoting learning and improvement. The development of performance management and evaluation in local government in the UK has been conditioned by external pressures, especially reforms imposed by central government, which have encouraged an 'instrumental-managerial' focus on performance measurement. The new Labour government's programme of 'modernizing local government' places considerable emphasis on performance review and evaluation as a driver of continuous improvement in promoting Best Value. However, recent research has indicated that the capacity for evaluation in local government is uneven and many obstacles to evaluation exist in organizational cultures. Local authorities need to go beyond the development of review systems and processes to ensure that the capacity for evaluation and learning is embedded as an attribute of 'culture' in order to achieve the purpose of Best Value.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 313
页数:17
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, POLICY STUDIES
[2]  
[Anonymous], MANAGING NEW PUBLIC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ORG LEARNING LEARNIN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, EVALUATION STRATEGIE
[5]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
[6]  
Audit Commission, 1995, CALL TUN PERF MAN LO
[7]  
BOVAIRD AG, 1996, ORG PERFORMANCE MEAS, P239
[8]  
BYNOE I, 1996, CITIZENS CHARTER NEW
[9]  
*CAB OFF, 1999, CMND4310
[10]  
CAVE M, 1990, OUTPUT PERFORMANCE M