Exploring the preferences of wildlife recreationists for features of boreal forest management: a choice experiment approach

被引:65
作者
Boxall, PC [1 ]
Macnab, B
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Rural Econ, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
[2] Canadian Forest Serv, No Forestry Ctr, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE | 2000年 / 30卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/cjfr-30-12-1931
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
This study uses stated preference methods to determine how Saskatchewan moose hunters and wildlife viewers would choose among hypothetical boreal forest management scenarios described by six attributes. The results suggest that preferences for these attributes differ between hunters and viewers and to a lesser extent among rural and urban residents participating in each activity. The preference models were applied to two management plans proposed by the Saskatchewan Forest Habitat Project to produce moose and woodland caribou habitat in a set of five areas visited by the wildlife recreationists in central Saskatchewan. The results suggest that the hunters would benefit from these plans more than the viewers. This information indicates that passive-use values rather than use values may play an important role in justifying forest management schemes which benefit wildlife species.
引用
收藏
页码:1931 / 1941
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[2]   Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Swait, J ;
Boxall, P ;
Louviere, J ;
Williams, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (01) :65-84
[3]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[4]  
Adamowicz W.L., 1999, 9902 U ALB DEP RUR E
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, ANAL DECISION MAKING
[6]  
Batsell R., 1991, Marketing Letters, V2, P199, DOI [10.1007/BF02404072, DOI 10.1007/BF02404072]
[7]   A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation [J].
Boxall, PC ;
Adamowicz, WL ;
Swait, J ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (03) :243-253
[8]  
FILION FL, 1993, IMPORTANCE WILDLIFE
[9]  
GREIF G, 1992, SFHP STEER COMM SFHP
[10]   MARGINAL WELFARE MEASURES FOR DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS [J].
HANEMANN, WM .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1983, 13 (2-3) :129-136