Real and Perceived Attitude Agreement in Social Networks

被引:136
作者
Goel, Sharad [1 ]
Mason, Winter [1 ]
Watts, Duncan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yahoo Res, New York, NY 10018 USA
关键词
homophily; similarity; attitudes; perception; networks; EGOCENTRIC BIAS; PROXY-REPORTS; CONSENSUS; STRATEGIES; PROJECTION; ACCURACY; POLARIZATION; SIMILARITY; PERCEPTION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1037/a0020697
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is often asserted that friends and acquaintances have more similar beliefs and attitudes than do strangers; yet empirical studies disagree over exactly how much diversity of opinion exists within local social networks and, relatedly, how much awareness individuals have of their neighbors' views. This article reports results from a network survey, conducted on the Facebook social networking platform, in which participants were asked about their own political attitudes, as well as their beliefs about their friends' attitudes. Although considerable attitude similarity exists among friends, the results show that friends disagree more than they think they do. In particular, friends are typically unaware of their disagreements, even when they say they discuss the topic, suggesting that discussion is not the primary means by which friends infer each other's views on particular issues. Rather, it appears that respondents infer opinions in part by relying on stereotypes of their friends and in part by projecting their own views. The resulting gap between real and perceived agreement may have implications for the dynamics of political polarization and theories of social influence in general.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 621
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Is polarization a myth? [J].
Abramowitz, Alan I. ;
Saunders, Kyle L. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2008, 70 (02) :542-555
[2]   Tracking information epidemics in blogspace [J].
Adar, E ;
Adamic, LA .
2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, Proceedings, 2005, :207-214
[3]   Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates [J].
Ames, DR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 87 (05) :573-585
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models
[5]  
[Anonymous], GOING EXTREMES LIKE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1957, Selective Exposure Theory
[7]   OPINIONS AND SOCIAL PRESSURE [J].
ASCH, SE .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1955, 193 (05) :31-35
[8]   Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion [J].
Baldassarri, Delia ;
Gelman, Andrew .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2008, 114 (02) :408-446
[9]   Dynamics of political polarization [J].
Baldassarri, Delia ;
Bearman, Peter .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (05) :784-811
[10]   Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: Conversation topics and network structure [J].
Bearman, P ;
Parigi, P .
SOCIAL FORCES, 2004, 83 (02) :535-557