R-R interval-blood pressure interaction in subjects with different tolerances to orthostatic stress

被引:20
作者
Gulli, G [1 ]
Claydon, VE [1 ]
Cooper, VL [1 ]
Hainsworth, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Inst Cardiovasc Res, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1113/expphysiol.2004.029496
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
In addition to the gain, the time delay in the input-output response in a feedback system is crucial for the maintenance of its stability. Patients with posturally related (vasovagal) syncope have inadequate control of blood pressure and one possible explanation for this could be prolonged latency of the baroreflex. We studied 14 patients with histories of syncope and poor orthostatic tolerance (assessed by a progressive orthostatic stress test) and 16 healthy controls. We performed spontaneous sequence analysis of the fluctuations of R-R period (ECG) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP, Finapres) recorded during a 20 min supine period and during 20 min 60 deg head-up tilt (HUT). The baroreflex latency was determined by identifying the lag between the changes in SAP and in R-R interval from which the highest correlation coefficient was obtained. During the supine period, 74% of sequences in control subjects and 54% in patients occurred with zero beats of delay (i.e. R-R interval changed within the same R-R interval). The remaining sequences occurred with delays of up to four beats. HUT shifted the baroreflex delay to be approximately one heartbeat slower and again patients showed more sequences with prolonged response. The delay in heartbeats was transformed into delay in time. In control subjects, 75% of baroreflex responses occurred within 1 s. In patients, 75% of baroreflex responses took more than 2 s to occur. The results showed that syncopal patients with poor orthostatic tolerance have increased baroreflex latency. This may lead to instability and inadequate blood pressure control and may predispose to vasovagal syncope.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 375
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   ARTERIAL-PRESSURE AND PULSE INTERVAL RESPONSES TO REPETITIVE CAROTID BARORECEPTOR STIMULI IN MAN [J].
BASKERVILLE, AL ;
ECKBERG, DL ;
THOMPSON, MA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1979, 297 (DEC) :61-71
[2]   LOW-FREQUENCY SPONTANEOUS FLUCTUATIONS OF R-R INTERVAL AND BLOOD-PRESSURE IN CONSCIOUS HUMANS - A BARORECEPTOR OR CENTRAL PHENOMENON [J].
BERNARDI, L ;
LEUZZI, S ;
RADAELLI, A ;
PASSINO, C ;
JOHNSTON, JA ;
SLEIGHT, P .
CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 87 (06) :649-654
[3]   CHANGE IN PHASE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SBP AND R-R INTERVAL DURING LOWER-BODY NEGATIVE-PRESSURE [J].
BLABER, AP ;
YAMAMOTO, Y ;
HUGHSON, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 268 (04) :H1688-H1693
[4]   METHODOLOGY OF SPONTANEOUS BAROREFLEX RELATIONSHIP ASSESSED BY SURROGATE DATA-ANALYSIS [J].
BLABER, AP ;
YAMAMOTO, Y ;
HUGHSON, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 268 (04) :H1682-H1687
[5]   TIME DELAYS IN THE HUMAN BARORECEPTOR REFLEX [J].
BORST, C ;
KAREMAKER, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM, 1983, 9 (2-3) :399-409
[6]   Modeling of cardiovascular variability using a differential delay equation [J].
Cavalcanti, S ;
Belardinelli, E .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 43 (10) :982-989
[7]   Baroreflex and oscillation of heart period at 0.1 Hz studied by α-blockade and cross-spectral analysis in healthy humans [J].
Cevese, A ;
Gulli, G ;
Polati, E ;
Gottin, L ;
Grasso, R .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2001, 531 (01) :235-244
[8]   HEMODYNAMIC FLUCTUATIONS AND BAROREFLEX SENSITIVITY IN HUMANS - A BEAT-TO-BEAT MODEL [J].
DEBOER, RW ;
KAREMAKER, JM ;
STRACKEE, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 253 (03) :H680-H689
[9]   Baroreflex effectiveness index: an additional measure of baroreflex control of heart rate in daily life [J].
Di Rienzo, M ;
Parati, G ;
Castiglioni, P ;
Tordi, R ;
Mancia, G ;
Pedotti, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-REGULATORY INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 280 (03) :R744-R751
[10]   The human respiratory gate [J].
Eckberg, DL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2003, 548 (02) :339-352