Comparison of perinatal grief after dilation and evacuation or tabor induction in second trimester terminations for fetal anomalies

被引:34
作者
Burgoine, GA
Van Kirk, SD
Romm, J
Edelman, AB
Jacobson, SL
Jensen, JT
机构
[1] Meridian Pk Hosp, Womens Healthcare Associates LLC, Tualatin, OR 97062 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
perinatal loss; stillbirth; fetal anomalies; second-trimester abortion; labor induction;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.064
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: This study was undertaken to compare grief resolution after dilation and evacuation (D&E) or induction of labor (IOL) for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Study design: A prospective cohort of 49 women choosing second-trimester abortion caused by fetal anomalies by either medical IOL or D&E. Depression was evaluated by using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and bereavement was assessed by using the Perinatal Grief Scale with follow-up to 12 months after pregnancy termination. Data were analyzed with X 2 tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and independent and paired sample t tests. Results: There was no significant difference in depression incidence on enrollment (61.9% D&E, 53.8% IOL, P = .579), at 4 months (23.5% D&E 14.3% IOL, P = .252) or 12 months (27.3% D&E 20.0%) IOL, P = .696) or on the PGS at 4 months (74.1 vs 90.2. P = .351) or 12 months (73.3 vs 86.4, P = .658). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in grief resolution among women who terminate a desired pregnancy by either medical or surgical abortion. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1928 / 1932
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion [J].
Autry, AM ;
Hayes, EC ;
Jacobson, GF ;
Kirby, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (02) :393-397
[2]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003, MMWR Recomm Rep, V52, P1
[3]  
COE S, 1998, GENETICS NW, V12, P5
[4]   The continuing need for late abortions [J].
Grimes, DA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (08) :747-750
[5]  
GRIMES DA, 1985, J REPROD MED, V30, P505
[6]   Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: A prospective comparison study [J].
Jensen, JT ;
Harvey, SM ;
Beckman, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (06) :1292-1297
[7]  
KAFRISSEN ME, 1984, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V251, P916
[8]   IMPACT OF MIDTRIMESTER-ABORTION TECHNIQUES ON PATIENTS AND STAFF [J].
KALTREIDER, NB ;
GOLDSMITH, S ;
MARGOLIS, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1979, 135 (02) :235-238
[10]  
Mansfield C, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P808, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199909)19:9<808::AID-PD637>3.0.CO