Outcomes in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Treated With Everolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Results From the SPIRIT IV Clinical Trial (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System)

被引:77
作者
Kereiakes, Dean J. [1 ,2 ]
Cutlip, Donald E. [3 ]
Applegate, Robert J. [4 ]
Wang, John [5 ]
Yaqub, Manejeh [6 ]
Sood, Poornima [6 ]
Su, Xiaolu [6 ]
Su, Guoping [6 ]
Farhat, Naim [7 ]
Rizvi, Ali [8 ]
Simonton, Charles A. [6 ]
Sudhir, Krishnankutty [6 ]
Stone, Gregg W. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Christ Hosp, Heart & Vasc Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[2] Carl & Edyth Lindner Ctr Res & Educ, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Harvard Clin Res Inst, Boston, MA USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[5] Union Mem Hosp, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Abbott Vasc, Santa Clara, CA USA
[7] EMH Reg Med Ctr, Elyria, OH USA
[8] Cardiovasc Specialists N Houston, Houston, TX USA
[9] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[10] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
关键词
diabetes; drug-eluting stent(s); everolimus; major adverse cardiac event(s); POOLED ANALYSIS; ARTERY-DISEASE; MELLITUS; RESTENOSIS; IMPACT; LONG; REVASCULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives We compared the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with the TAXUS Express (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) among the large cohort of randomized diabetic patients enrolled in the SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) trial. Background Diabetes mellitus remains a significant predictor of adverse clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents, and the comparative outcomes of different drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients remains ill-defined. Methods In the SPIRIT IV trial, 3,687 patients with up to 3 de novo native coronary artery lesions were prospectively randomized 2: 1 to receive EES or PES. Randomization was stratified by the presence of diabetes and lesion complexity. The primary end point was the occurrence of target lesion failure (TLF) (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in randomized diabetic (n = 1,185 [786 EES; 399 PES]) and nondiabetic patients (n = 2,498 [1,669 EES; 829 PES]). Results The EES compared with PES reduced TLF in nondiabetic patients (3.1% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.0001), with significant reductions in myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization. In contrast, no difference in TLF (6.4% vs. 6.9%, respectively, p = 0.80) or any of its components was present among diabetic patients, regardless of insulin use. A significant interaction between the presence of diabetes and stent type on TLF (p(interaction) = 0.02) was observed. Conclusions In the SPIRIT IV randomized trial, EES compared with PES provided similar clinical outcomes in diabetic patients and superior clinical outcomes in nondiabetic patients at 1 year. (SPIRIT IV Clinical Trial: Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00307047) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:2084-9) (C) 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:2084 / 2089
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   World Heart Day 2002 - The international burden of cardiovascular disease: Responding to the emerging global epidemic [J].
Bonow, RO ;
Smaha, LA ;
Smith, SC ;
Mensah, GA ;
Lenfant, C .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (13) :1602-1605
[2]  
Caixeta A, 2009, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V53, pA2
[3]   Clinical end points in coronary stent trials - A case for standardized definitions [J].
Cutlip, Donald E. ;
Windecker, Stephan ;
Mehran, Roxana ;
Boam, Ashley ;
Cohen, David J. ;
van Es, Gerrit-Anne ;
Steg, P. Gabriel ;
Morel, Marie-angele ;
Mauri, Laura ;
Vranckx, Pascal ;
McFadden, Eugene ;
Lansky, Alexandra ;
Hamon, Martial ;
Krucoff, Mitchell W. ;
Serruys, Patrick W. .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (17) :2344-2351
[4]   Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients [J].
Dibra, A ;
Kastrati, A ;
Mehilli, J ;
Pache, J ;
Schühlen, H ;
von Beckerath, N ;
Ulm, K ;
Wessely, R ;
Dirschinger, J ;
Schömig, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (07) :663-670
[5]  
Grube E., 2010, EUROPCR PAR FRANC MA
[6]   Outcomes with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent in patients with diabetes mellitus - The TAXUS-IV trial [J].
Hermiller, JB ;
Raizner, A ;
Cannon, L ;
Gurbel, PA ;
Kutcher, MA ;
Wong, SC ;
Russell, ME ;
Ellis, SG ;
Mehran, R ;
Stone, GW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (08) :1172-1179
[7]   Impact of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes in the drug-eluting stent era [J].
Iijima, Raisuke ;
Ndrepepa, Gjin ;
Mehilli, Julinda ;
Markwardt, Christina ;
Bruskina, Olga ;
Pache, Juergen ;
Ibrahim, Maryam ;
Schoemig, Albert ;
Kastrati, Adnan .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 154 (04) :688-693
[8]   Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents [J].
Joner, Michael ;
Nakazawa, Gaku ;
Finn, Aloke V. ;
Quee, Shawn Chin ;
Coleman, Leslie ;
Acampado, Eduardo ;
Wilson, Patricia S. ;
Skorija, Kristi ;
Cheng, Qi ;
Xu, Xin ;
Gold, Herman K. ;
Kolodgie, Frank D. ;
Virmani, Renu .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (05) :333-342
[9]   Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial [J].
Kedhi, Elvin ;
Joesoef, Kaiyum Sheik ;
McFadden, Eugene ;
Wassing, Jochem ;
van Mieghem, Carlos ;
Goedhart, Dick ;
Smits, Pieter Cornelis .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9710) :201-209
[10]   Paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients with diabetes mellitus - Pooled analysis from 5 randomized trials [J].
Kirtane, Ajay J. ;
Ellis, Stephen G. ;
Dawkins, Keith D. ;
Colombo, Antonio ;
Grube, Eberhard ;
Popma, Jefrey J. ;
Fahy, Martin ;
Leon, Martin B. ;
Moses, Jefrey W. ;
Mehran, Roxana ;
Stone, Gregg W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 51 (07) :708-715