Does suppression of postprandial blood glucose excursions by the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol improve insulin sensitivity in diet-treated type II diabetic patients?

被引:26
作者
Johnson, AB [1 ]
Taylor, R [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE,SCH MED,DEPT MED,NEWCASTLE TYNE NE2 4HH,TYNE & WEAR,ENGLAND
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.19.6.559
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE- Insulin sensitivity is impaired in patients with type II diabetes and is exacerbated by high mean blood glucose (BG). Potentially, large postprandial swings in BG could result in further decrements of insulin sensitivity. Because a-glucosidase inhibitors cause a marked reduction in the amplitude of BG changes, the aim of this study was to determine if such a BG-smoothing effect improves insulin sensitivity in well-controlled type II diabetic subjects treated with diet alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- Patients received either miglitol (BAY m 1099) (50 mg three times daily) or placebo for 8 weeks in a randomized double-blind parallel study. The miglitol (9 men, 2 women) and placebo (7 men, 3 women) groups were well marched (mean +/- SD) for age, weight, and blood glucose control (fasting BG, 6.4 +/- 1.0 vs. 6.9 +/- 1.6 mmol/l; HbA(1), 7.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.4%; fructosamine, 0.99 +/- 0.08 vs. 1.07 +/- 0.17 mmol/l). The glucose metabolic clearance rate was calculated during the last 30 min of a 150 min glucose/insulin sensitivity test (glucose, 6 mg . kg(-1). min(-1); insulin, 0.5 U . kg(-1). min(-1)). RESULTS- There was no significant improvement in metabolic clearance rate(0.21 +/- 0.27 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.35 I . kg(-1). min(-1)) for the miglitol- and placebo-treated groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between miglitol and placebo for changes from baseline in BG (0.1 +/- 0.1 vs. -0.1 +/- 0.2 mmol/l), HbA(1) (0.1 +/- 0,1 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.1%), and fructosamine (-0.06 +/- 0.02 vs.-0.03 +/- 0.02 mmol/l). CONCLUSIONS- alpha-glucosidase-induced improvement in postprandial hyperglycemia does not result in increased insulin sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 563
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] ARMITAGE P, 1987, STATISTICAL METHODS, P222
  • [2] EFFECTS OF ALPHA-GLUCOSIDASE INHIBITION ON MEAL GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE AND TIMING OF INSULIN ADMINISTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE-I DIABETES-MELLITUS
    DIMITRIADIS, G
    HATZIAGELLAKI, E
    ALEXOPOULOS, E
    KORDONOURI, O
    KOMESIDOU, V
    GANOTAKIS, M
    RAPTIS, S
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1991, 14 (05) : 393 - 398
  • [3] THERAPEUTIC POTENTIALS OF ACARBOSE AS 1ST-LINE DRUG IN NIDDM INSUFFICIENTLY TREATED WITH DIET ALONE
    HANEFELD, M
    FISCHER, S
    SCHULZE, J
    SPENGLER, M
    WARGENAU, M
    SCHOLLBERG, K
    FUCKER, K
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1991, 14 (08) : 732 - 737
  • [4] RADIOIMMUNOLOGICAL DETERMINATION OF HUMAN C-PEPTIDE IN SERUM
    HEDING, LG
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 1975, 11 (06) : 541 - 548
  • [5] HEINZ G, 1989, EUR J CLIN PHARMACOL, V37, P33
  • [6] LOW-DOSE ACARBOSE IMPROVES GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN NIDDM PATIENTS WITHOUT CHANGES IN INSULIN SENSITIVITY
    JENNEY, A
    PROIETTO, J
    ODEA, K
    NANKERVIS, A
    TRAIANEDES, K
    DEMBDEN, H
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1993, 16 (02) : 499 - 502
  • [7] THE EFFECT OF SULFONYLUREA THERAPY ON SKELETAL-MUSCLE GLYCOGEN-SYNTHASE ACTIVITY AND INSULIN-SECRETION IN NEWLY PRESENTING TYPE-2 (NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT) DIABETIC-PATIENTS
    JOHNSON, AB
    ARGYRAKI, M
    THOW, JC
    JONES, IR
    BROUGHTON, D
    MILLER, M
    TAYLOR, R
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1991, 8 (03) : 243 - 253
  • [8] ALPHA-GLUCOSIDASE INHIBITION BY MIGLITOL IN NIDDM PATIENTS
    KINGMA, PJ
    MENHEERE, PPCA
    SELS, JP
    KRUSEMAN, ACN
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1992, 15 (04) : 478 - 483
  • [9] Lebovitz H E, 1992, Drugs, V44 Suppl 3, P21
  • [10] INHIBITION OF SUCROSE-INDUCED AND STARCH-INDUCED GLYCEMIC AND HORMONAL RESPONSES BY THE ALPHA-GLUCOSIDASE INHIBITOR EMIGLITATE (BAY-O-1248) IN HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS
    LEMBCKE, B
    FOLSCH, UR
    GATZEMEIER, W
    LUCKE, B
    EBERT, R
    SIEGEL, E
    CREUTZFELDT, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 41 (06) : 561 - 567