A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control

被引:53
作者
Datta, D
Heller, B
Howitt, J
机构
[1] No Gen Hosp, Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Mobil & Specialised Rehabil Ctr, Sheffield S5 7AT, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1191/0269215505cr805oa
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the gait of amputees wearing conventionally damped pneumatic swing-phase control knees and microchip-controlled Intelligent Prostheses. Design: Crossover trial. Setting: An amputee rehabilitation centre in a teaching hospital. Participants: Ten established unilateral transfemoral prosthetic users were asked to participate in the trial, all agreed. Interventions: The amputees were assessed wearing pneumatic swing-phase control knees and then with the Intelligent Prosthesis. Main outcome measures: Oxygen consumption while walking at different speeds on a treadmill, video-recording of gait assessed by a panel and temporal-spatial parameters of gait whilst walking at slow, fast or normal speeds in a gait laboratory. Results: Mean oxygen cost for all subjects at 0.69 m/s was 0.33 ml/kg.m with the conventional limb and 0.30 ml/kg.m with the Intelligent Prosthesis (p = 0.01). At 1.25 m/s the mean oxygen cost for the conventional limb was 0.24 ml/kg.m and for the Intelligent Prosthesis was 0.22 ml/kg.m (not significant). The ANOVA analysis showed that oxygen cost was similar at normal walking speeds but increased more at lower speeds for the pneumatic swing-phase control leg compared to the Intelligent Prosthesis (p < 0.02). There were no significant differences in subjective gait evaluation or temporal and spatial gait parameters. Conclusion: At lower speeds oxygen cost was lower with the Intelligent Prosthesis. Gait analysis detected no significant changes between the two legs.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 403
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, CLIN REHABIL
  • [2] Energy cost of walking: Comparison of ''Intelligent prosthesis'' with conventional mechanism
    Buckley, JG
    Spence, WD
    Solomonidis, SE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (03): : 330 - 333
  • [3] Datta D, 1998, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V22, P129
  • [4] A pilot study comparing the cognitive demand of walking for transfemoral amputees using the Intelligent Prosthesis with that using conventionally damped knees
    Heller, BW
    Datta, D
    Howitt, J
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2000, 14 (05) : 518 - 522
  • [5] ISAKOV E, 1985, SCAND J REHABIL MED, P108
  • [6] KAUFMAN KR, 1996, J PROSTHET ORTHOT, V8, P79
  • [7] Michael JW, 1999, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P39
  • [8] SIENKOTHOMAS S, 1998, GAIT POSTURE, V7, P151
  • [9] STAROS A, 1991, PHYS MED REHABIL CLI, V2, P311
  • [10] Taylor MB, 1996, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V20, P116