Quantifying the uncertainty in the orbits of extrasolar planets

被引:353
作者
Ford, EB [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Astrophys Sci, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
methods : statistical; planetary systems : general; techniques : radical velocities;
D O I
10.1086/427962
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Precise radial velocity measurements have led to the discovery of similar to 100 extrasolar planetary systems. We investigate the uncertainty in the orbital solutions that have been fitted to these observations. Understanding these uncertainties will become more and more important as the discovery space for extrasolar planets shifts to longer and longer periods. While detections of short-period planets can be rapidly refined, planets with long orbital periods will require observations spanning decades to constrain the orbital parameters precisely. Already in some cases, multiple distinct orbital solutions provide similarly good fits, particularly in multiple-planet systems. We present a method for quantifying the uncertainties in orbital fits and addressing specific questions directly from the observational data rather than relying on best-fit orbital solutions. This Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique has the advantage that it is well suited to the high-dimensional parameter spaces necessary for the multiple-planet systems. We apply the MCMC technique to several extrasolar planetary systems, assessing the uncertainties in orbital elements for several systems. Our MCMC simulations demonstrate that for some systems there are strong correlations between orbital parameters and/or significant non-Gaussianities in parameter distributions, even though the measurement errors are nearly Gaussian. Once these effects are considered, the actual uncertainties in orbital elements can be significantly larger or smaller than the published uncertainties. We also present simple applications of our methods, such as predicting the times of possible transits for GJ 876.
引用
收藏
页码:1706 / 1717
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   A Bayesian analysis of the Cepheid distance scale [J].
Barnes, TG ;
Jefferys, WH ;
Berger, JO ;
Mueller, PJ ;
Orr, K ;
Rodriguez, R .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 592 (01) :539-554
[2]   New information from radial velocity data sets [J].
Brown, RA .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 610 (02) :1079-1092
[3]   Attaining Doppler precision of 3 m s(-1) [J].
Butler, RP ;
Marcy, GW ;
Williams, E ;
McCarthy, C ;
Dosanjh, P ;
Vogt, SS .
PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC, 1996, 108 (724) :500-509
[4]   Seven new Keck planets orbiting G and K dwarfs [J].
Butler, RP ;
Marcy, GW ;
Vogt, SS ;
Fischer, DA ;
Henry, GW ;
Laughlin, G ;
Wright, JT .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 582 (01) :455-466
[5]   A planet with a 3.1 day period around a solar twin [J].
Butler, RP ;
Marcy, GW ;
Vogt, SS ;
Apps, K .
PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC, 1998, 110 (754) :1389-1393
[6]   Evidence for multiple companions to υ andromedae [J].
Butler, RP ;
Marcy, GW ;
Fischer, DA ;
Brown, TM ;
Contos, AR ;
Korzennik, SG ;
Nisenson, P ;
Noyes, RW .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 526 (02) :916-927
[7]   GENETIC ALGORITHMS IN ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS [J].
CHARBONNEAU, P .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1995, 101 (02) :309-334
[8]   Convergence analyses and comparisons of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms in digital communications [J].
Chen, R ;
Liu, JS ;
Wang, XD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2002, 50 (02) :255-270
[9]   Apsidal alignment in v Andromedae [J].
Chiang, EI ;
Tabachnik, S ;
Tremaine, S .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 122 (03) :1607-1615
[10]   A probabilistic formulation for empirical population synthesis:: sampling methods and tests [J].
Fernandes, RC ;
Sodre, L ;
Schmitt, HR ;
Leao, JRS .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 325 (01) :60-76