Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects

被引:75
作者
Qaim, M [1 ]
De Janvry, A
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Dept Agr Econ & Social Sci Trop & Subtrop, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1355770X04001883
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article analyzes effects of insect-resistant Bt cotton on pesticide use and agricultural productivity in Argentina. Based on farm survey data, it is shown that the technology reduces application rates of toxic chemicals by 50 per cent, while significantly increasing yields. Using a damage control framework, the effectiveness of Bt versus chemical pesticides is estimated, and technological impacts are predicted for different farm types. Gross benefits could be highest for smallholder farmers, who are not currently using the technology. The durability of the advantages is analyzed by using biological models to simulate resistance development in pest populations. Rapid resistance buildup and associated pest outbreaks appear to be unlikely if minimum non-Bt refuge areas are maintained. Thus, promoting a more widespread diffusion of Bt cotton could amplify the efficiency, equity, and environmental gains. Conclusive statements about the technology's sustainability, however, require longer-term monitoring of possible secondary effects and farmers' behavior in maintaining refuges.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 200
页数:22
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Development of Spodoptera exigua and Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on transgenic cotton containing CrylAc insecticidal protein [J].
Ashfaq, M ;
Young, SY ;
McNew, RW .
JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 35 (04) :360-372
[2]   IMPACT OF DAMAGE CONTROL AND QUALITY OF OUTPUT - ESTIMATING PEST-CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS [J].
BABCOCK, BA ;
LICHTENBERG, E ;
ZILBERMAN, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 74 (01) :163-172
[3]   Transgenic crops and the environment: missing markets and public roles [J].
Batie, SS ;
Ervin, DE .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2001, 6 :435-457
[4]  
Benbrook C., 2001, Pesticide Outlook, V12, P204, DOI 10.1039/b108609j
[5]  
Carpenter J., 2002, Comparative Environmental Impacts of Biotechnology-Derived and Traditional Soybean, Corn, and Cotton Crops
[6]   DAMAGE CONTROL ECONOMETRICS - FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTIVITY [J].
CARRASCOTAUBER, C ;
MOFFITT, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 74 (01) :158-162
[7]   Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: Integrating pest genetics and ecology [J].
Gould, F .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 1998, 43 :701-726
[8]   Quantification of Bacillus thuringiensis insect control protein Cry1Ac over time in Bollgard cotton fruit and terminals [J].
Greenplate, JT .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1999, 92 (06) :1377-1383
[9]   ANALYSIS OF COTTON PRODUCTION IN CALIFORNIA - MODEL FOR ACALA COTTON AND EFFECTS OF DEFOLIATORS ON ITS YIELDS [J].
GUTIERREZ, AP ;
FALCON, LA ;
LOEW, W ;
LEIPZIG, PA ;
VANDENBOSCH, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1975, 4 (01) :125-136
[10]  
GUTIERREZ AP, 2002, PHYSL BASED MODEL BT