Portfolio Choice Under Cumulative Prospect Theory: An Analytical Treatment

被引:164
作者
He, Xue Dong [1 ]
Zhou, Xun Yu [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Operat Res, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Nomura Ctr Math Finance, Oxford OX1 3LB, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Man Inst Quantitat Finance, Oxford OX2 6ED, England
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
portfolio choice; single period; cumulative prospect theory; reference point; loss aversion; S-shaped utility function; probability weighting; well-posedness; PROBABILITY WEIGHTING FUNCTION; LOSS AVERSION; UNCERTAINTY; UTILITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1100.1269
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We formulate and carry out an analytical treatment of a single-period portfolio choice model featuring a reference point in wealth, S-shaped utility (value) functions with loss aversion, and probability weighting under Kahneman and Tversky's cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We introduce a new measure of loss aversion for large payoffs, called the large-loss aversion degree (LLAD), and show that it is a critical determinant of the well-posedness of the model. The sensitivity of the CPT value function with respect to the stock allocation is then investigated, which, as a by-product, demonstrates that this function is neither concave nor convex. We finally derive optimal solutions explicitly for the cases in which the reference point is the risk-free return and those in which it is not (while the utility function is piecewise linear), and we employ these results to investigate comparative statics of optimal risky exposures with respect to the reference point, the LLAD, and the curvature of the probability weighting.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 331
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]   Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices [J].
Barberis, Nicholas ;
Huang, Ming .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (05) :2066-2100
[3]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92
[4]   Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion [J].
Berkelaar, AB ;
Kouwenberg, R ;
Post, T .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2004, 86 (04) :973-987
[5]   Static portfolio choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory [J].
Bernard, Carole ;
Ghossoub, Mario .
MATHEMATICS AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (04) :277-306
[6]   Gain, loss, and asset pricing [J].
Bernardo, AE ;
Ledoit, O .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 108 (01) :144-172
[7]  
DEGIORGI E, 2004, EXISTENCE CAPM EQUIL
[8]  
Denneberg D., 1994, NONADDITIVE MEASURE
[9]   Portfolio choice and trading volume with loss-averse investors [J].
Gomes, FJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2005, 78 (02) :675-706
[10]   Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time [J].
Jin, Hanqing ;
Zhou, Xun Yu .
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2008, 18 (03) :385-426