Should each core with prostate cancer be assigned a separate Gleason score?

被引:43
作者
Kunz, GM [1 ]
Epstein, JI [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; needle biopsy; Gleason grade;
D O I
10.1016/S0046-8177(03)00338-1
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
If multiple biopsy cores contain prostate cancer with differing Gleason scores, should an overall Gleason score be assigned, or should each core be graded separately? We obtained data on 127 men with prostate cancer on needle biopsy who underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy at our institution. We compared the Gleason scores found on needle biopsy with the grade and stage (organ-confined, extra-prostatic extension, positive seminal vesicles or lymph nodes) at radical prostatectomy. On biopsy, 40 men had a pure Gleason score of 4 + 3 = 7, 25 men had a Gleason score of 4 + 3 = 7 with a Gleason score of 3 + 3 = 6 on a separate core of the biopsy specimen, 27 men had a pure Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8, and 35 men had a Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8 with separate cores containing Gleason pattern grade 3. A Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8 with pattern grade 3 in other cores had a more advanced stage than a pure Gleason score of 4 + 3 = 7 (P = 0.008). There was no clear pattern analyzing pathological stage of men with a pure Gleason score of 4 + 3 = 7 in comparison with those with Gleason scores of 4 + 3 = 7 and 3 + 3 = 6 in other cores. The group with a Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8 and Gleason pattern grade 3 on other cores had a higher overall grade on radical prostatectomy than the group with a pure Gleason score of 4 + 3 = 7 (P = 0.001). If one had assigned an overall Gleason score, then a biopsy with Gleason score 4 + 4 = 8 on 1 or more cores and some pattern grade 3 in other cores, would be designated as a Gleason score of 4 + 3 = 7. Based on our findings, patients with a Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8 on one or more cores with pattern grade 3 in other cores should be given a final Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8 instead of 4 + 3 = 7, because these patients are more likely to have higher stage and grade on radical prostatectomy, comparable to a pure Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8. Each core should be assigned a separate Gleason score, especially in cases with high Gleason score cancer on at least 1 core. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 914
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   An algorithm for predicting nonorgan confined prostate cancer using the results obtained from sextant core biopsies with prostate specific antigen level [J].
Badalament, RA ;
Miller, MC ;
Peller, PA ;
Young, DC ;
Bahn, DK ;
Kochie, P ;
ODowd, GJ ;
Veltri, RW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (04) :1375-1380
[2]   Gleason score 2-4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy - A diagnosis that should not be made [J].
Epstein, JI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2000, 24 (04) :477-478
[3]   Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy - A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Partin, AW ;
Sauvageot, J ;
Walsh, PC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1996, 20 (03) :286-292
[4]   The pathological interpretation and significance of prostate needle biopsy findings: Implications and current controversies [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Potter, SR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) :402-410
[5]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64
[6]   A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Kattan, MW ;
Eastham, JA ;
Stapleton, AMF ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Scardino, PT .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (10) :766-771
[7]  
MCNEAL JE, 1990, CANCER, V66, P1225, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1225::AID-CNCR2820660624>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-X
[9]   THE ROLE OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY-BASED STAGING, PREOPERATIVE SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, AND BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE IN PREDICTION OF FINAL PATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS IN PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
NARAYAN, P ;
GAJENDRAN, V ;
TAYLOR, SP ;
TEWARI, A ;
PRESTI, JC ;
LEIDICH, R ;
LO, R ;
PALMER, K ;
SHINOHARA, K ;
SPAULDING, JT .
UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (02) :205-212
[10]   Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: Lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer [J].
Noguchi, M ;
Stamey, TA ;
McNeal, JE ;
Yemoto, CM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (01) :104-109