New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design

被引:188
作者
Battini, D. [1 ]
Faccio, M. [2 ]
Persona, A. [1 ]
Sgarbossa, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Management & Engn, I-36100 Vicenza, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Innovat Mech & Management, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
Ergonomics; Assembly system; Balancing problem; Integrated approach; Methodological framework; WORK; QUALITY; PERSPECTIVE; STRATEGIES; WORKPLACE; TOOLS; MODEL; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This work analyses how ergonomics and assembly system design techniques are intimately related. It also develops a new theoretical framework to assess a concurrent engineering approach to assembly systems design problems, in conjunction with an ergonomics optimization of the workplace. Its purpose is to provide professionals with a new and detailed approach to assembly system design procedures that includes ergonomics issues. The methodological framework offered takes into account technological variables (related to work times and methods), environmental variables (i.e. absenteeism, staff turnover, work force motivation) and ergonomics evaluations (i.e. human diversity) to create a comprehensive analysis. At conclusion of the study, the work reports data and insights from two real industrial cases, where an advanced simulation software is used, to validate the procedure and support methodology applicability. Relevance to industries: This work provides an extremely valuable methodological framework to companies who recognize the link between assembly and ergonomics. The methodology underlines the necessity to analyze and classify the assembly system layout configuration in relation to both technological and environmental parameters- as reported in the framework. (C) 2010 Elsevier BM. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 42
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A review of the support tools for the process of assembly method selection and assembly planning [J].
Abdullah, TA ;
Popplewell, K ;
Page, CJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2003, 41 (11) :2391-2410
[2]   Performance measurement in supply chains: new network analysis and entropic indexes [J].
Allesina, S. ;
Azzi, A. ;
Battini, D. ;
Regattieri, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (08) :2297-2321
[3]  
[Anonymous], CORPORATE ADVANTAGE
[4]   Dynamics of two- and three-worker "bucket brigade" production lines [J].
Bartholdi, JJ ;
Bunimovich, LA ;
Eisenstein, DD .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1999, 47 (03) :488-491
[5]   Design configuration for a mixed-model assembly system in case of low product demand [J].
Battini, D. ;
Faccio, M. ;
Ferrari, E. ;
Persona, A. ;
Sgarbossa, F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 34 (1-2) :188-200
[6]   Balancing-sequencing procedure for a mixed model assembly system in case of finite buffer capacity [J].
Battini, Daria ;
Faccio, Maurizio ;
Persona, Alessandro ;
Sgarbossa, Fabio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 44 (3-4) :345-359
[7]   A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing [J].
Becker, C ;
Scholl, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 168 (03) :694-715
[8]   Corporate-internal vs. national standard - A comparison study of two ergonomics evaluation procedures used in automotive manufacturing [J].
Berlin, Cecilia ;
Ortengran, Roland ;
Lamkull, Dan ;
Hanson, Lars .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2009, 39 (06) :940-946
[9]   Evaluation of human postures with computer aids and virtual workplace designs [J].
Carey, EJ ;
Gallwey, TJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (04) :825-843
[10]  
DANIELLOU F, 2007, SIMULATING FUTURE WO, V4