Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film

被引:13
作者
Price, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Fac Dent, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
关键词
radiography; dental; X-ray film;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600569
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare a new experimental Kodak (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) F-speed dental X-ray film with Ektaspeed Plus and Ultra-speed. Methods: The three types of film were exposed and processed under standardized conditions. Values of base plus fog, speed, and film contrast were derived. Resolution was compared by a line-pair plate. Results: Under these experimental conditions, the speed of the new film was just into the F-speed range, and a little over twice as fast as Ultra-speed. The Ektaspeed Plus emulsion was somewhat slower than previously recorded when it was first introduced, but around the centre of the E-speed range. Ektaspeed Plus and the new F-speed him had almost identical film contrasts, the F-speed film having slightly greater contrast in the higher density range. Ultraspeed contrast was marginally greater in the lower density range, but was overtaken by both of the other emulsions at higher densities. All three emulsions had low values of base plus fog. Both E- and F-speed films resolved 10 line-pairs per millimetre well, though both emulsions were inferior to Ultra-speed. Conclusions: The new F-speed film, since marketed as Insight, provides a further saving in radiation exposure, with no evident deterioration in him contrast or resolution.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 34
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Causes of excessive bitewing exposure - Results of a survey regarding radiographic equipment in New York [J].
Button, TM ;
Moore, WC ;
Goren, AD .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1999, 87 (04) :513-517
[2]   Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging [J].
Farman, AG .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (05) :257-259
[3]   Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films [J].
Farman, TT ;
Farman, AG .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (01) :41-45
[4]   Updated quality assurance self-assessment exercise in intraoral and panoramic radiography [J].
Goren, AD ;
Lundeen, RC ;
Deahl, ST ;
Hashimoto, K ;
Kapa, SF ;
Katz, JO ;
Ludlow, JB ;
Platin, E ;
Van Der Stelt, P ;
Wolfgang, L .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2000, 89 (03) :369-374
[5]   CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE USE OF D-SPEED FILM, E-SPEED FILM, AND XERORADIOGRAPHY [J].
GRATT, BM ;
WHITE, SC ;
HALSE, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 117 (05) :609-614
[6]  
*ISO, 1991, 57991991E ISO
[7]   EFFICACY OF DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC PRACTICES - OPTIONS FOR IMAGE RECEPTORS, EXAMINATION SELECTION, AND PATIENT SELECTION [J].
KANTOR, ML ;
ZEICHNER, SJ ;
VALACHOVIC, RW ;
REISKIN, AB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 119 (02) :259-268
[8]  
Price C, 1991, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V20, P11
[9]   SENSITOMETRIC EVALUATION OF A NEW E-SPEED DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC FILM [J].
PRICE, C .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 24 (01) :30-36
[10]  
PRICE C, 1997, ADV MAXILLOFACIAL IM, P271