The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0

被引:1714
作者
Kahrilas, P. J. [1 ]
Bredenoord, A. J. [1 ]
Fox, M. [1 ]
Gyawali, C. P. [1 ]
Roman, S. [1 ]
Smout, A. J. P. M. [1 ]
Pandolfino, J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
achalasia; dysphagia; esophageal motility disorders; high-resolution manometry; ineffective esophageal motility; HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY; CONTRACTILE DECELERATION POINT; AUTOMATED IMPEDANCE MANOMETRY; PRESSURE TOPOGRAPHY; BOLUS TRANSIT; NORMATIVE VALUES; ACID EXPOSURE; EGJ; RELAXATION; ABNORMALITIES;
D O I
10.1111/nmo.12477
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
BackgroundThe Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders, utilizing an algorithmic scheme to analyze clinical high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies, has gained acceptance worldwide. MethodsThis 2014 update, CC v3.0, developed by the International HRM Working Group, incorporated the extensive clinical experience and interval publications since the prior (2011) version. Key ResultsChicago Classification v3.0 utilizes a hierarchical approach, sequentially prioritizing: (i) disorders of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow (achalasia subtypes I-III and EGJ outflow obstruction), (ii) major disorders of peristalsis (absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus), and (iii) minor disorders of peristalsis characterized by impaired bolus transit. EGJ morphology, characterized by the degree of overlap between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm and baseline EGJ contractility are also part of CC v3.0. Compared to the previous CC version, the key metrics of interpretation, the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), the distal contractile integral (DCI), and the distal latency (DL) remain unchanged, albeit with much more emphasis on DCI for defining both hypo- and hypercontractility. New in CC v3.0 are: (i) the evaluation of the EGJ at rest defined in terms of morphology and contractility, (ii) fragmented' contractions (large breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour), (iii) ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and (iv) several minor adjustments in nomenclature and defining criteria. Absent in CC v3.0 are contractile front velocity and small breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour as defining characteristics. Conclusions & InferencesChicago Classification v3.0 is an updated analysis scheme for clinical esophageal HRM recordings developed by the International HRM Working Group.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 174
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
Revised Criterion for Diagnosis of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Is Associated With More Frequent Dysphagia and Greater Bolus Transit Abnormalities [J].
Blonski, Wojciech ;
Vela, Marcelo ;
Safder, Akber ;
Hila, Amine ;
Castell, Donald O. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (03) :699-704
[2]
Normal values for esophageal high-resolution manometry [J].
Bogte, A. ;
Bredenoord, A. J. ;
Oors, J. ;
Siersema, P. D. ;
Smout, A. J. P. M. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2013, 25 (09) :762-E579
[3]
Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography [J].
Bredenoord, A. J. ;
Fox, M. ;
Kahrilas, P. J. ;
Pandolfino, J. E. ;
Schwizer, W. ;
Smout, A. J. P. M. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2012, 24 :57-65
[4]
Intermittent spatial separation of diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter favors acidic and weakly acidic reflux [J].
Bredenoord, AJ ;
Weusten, BLAM ;
Timmer, R ;
Smout, AJPM .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (02) :334-340
[5]
Intersubject and interswallow variability in topography of esophageal motility [J].
Clouse, RE ;
Alrakawi, A ;
Staiano, A .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1998, 43 (09) :1978-1985
[6]
Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease [J].
Daum, C. ;
Sweis, R. ;
Kaufman, E. ;
Fuellemann, A. ;
Anggiansah, A. ;
Fried, M. ;
Fox, M. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2011, 23 (06) :517-E200
[7]
Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry [J].
Fornari, F. ;
Bravi, I. ;
Penagini, R. ;
Tack, J. ;
Sifrim, D. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2009, 21 (07) :718-E41
[8]
Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls [J].
Ghosh, Sudip K. ;
Pandolfino, John E. ;
Rice, John ;
Clarke, John O. ;
Kwiatek, Monika ;
Kahrilas, Peter J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER PHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 293 (04) :G878-G885
[9]
Gor P, 2014, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V146, pS884
[10]
High resolution manometry: the Ray Clouse legacy [J].
Gyawali, C. P. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2012, 24 :2-4