Temporal and spatial rainfall analysis across a humid tropical catchment

被引:38
作者
Campling, P [1 ]
Gobin, A [1 ]
Feyen, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Lab Soil & Water, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
rainfall analysis; climatological variogram; Ordinary Kriging; humid tropical catchment;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.98
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Temporal and spatial rainfall patterns were analysed to describe the distribution of daily rainfall across a medium-sized (379 km(2)) tropical catchment. Investigations were carried out to assess whether a climatological variogram model was appropriate for mapping rainfall taking into consideration the changing rainfall characteristics through the wet season. Exploratory, frequency and moving average analyses of 30 years' daily precipitation data were used to describe the reliability and structure of the rainfall regime. Four phases in the wet season were distinguished, with the peak period (mid-August to mid-September) representing the wettest period. A low-cost rain gauge network of 36 plastic gauges with overflow reservoirs was installed and monitored to obtain spatially distributed rainfall data. Geostatistical techniques were used to develop global and wet season phase climatological variograms. The unscaled climatological variograms were cross-validated and compared using a range of rainfall events. Ordinary Kriging was performed better, used as the interpolation method. The global climatological variogram gamma* = 1.2 [1 - exp - h/18 km] performed better, and was used to optimize the number and location of rain gauges in the network. The research showed that although distinct wet season phases could be established based on the temporal analysis of daily rainfall characteristics, the interpolation of daily rainfall across a medium-sized catchment based on spatial analysis was better served by using the global rather than the wet season phase climatological variogram model. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 375
页数:17
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Adelekan IO, 1998, INT J CLIMATOL, V18, P1273, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199809)18:11<1273::AID-JOC298>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-4
[3]  
Akima H., 1978, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, V4, P148, DOI 10.1145/355780.355786
[4]   OPTIMAL ESTIMATION OF THE AVERAGE AREAL RAINFALL AND OPTIMAL SELECTION OF RAIN-GAUGE LOCATIONS [J].
BASTIN, G ;
LORENT, B ;
DUQUE, C ;
GEVERS, M .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1984, 20 (04) :463-470
[5]   On the interpolation of hydrologic variables: Formal equivalence of multiquadratic surface fitting and kriging [J].
Borga, M ;
Vizzaccaro, A .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1997, 195 (1-4) :160-171
[6]   OBJECTIVE ANALYSES AND MAPPING TECHNIQUES FOR RAINFALL FIELDS - AN OBJECTIVE COMPARISON [J].
CREUTIN, JD ;
OBLED, C .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1982, 18 (02) :413-431
[7]   Kriging in the Hydrosciences [J].
Delhomme, J. P. .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1978, 1 (05) :251-266
[8]  
DUCHON J, 1976, REV FR AUTOMAT INFOR, V10, P5
[9]   VARIOGRAM IDENTIFICATION BY THE MEAN-SQUARED INTERPOLATION ERROR METHOD WITH APPLICATION TO HYDROLOGIC FIELDS [J].
LEBEL, T ;
BASTIN, G .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1985, 77 (1-4) :31-56
[10]   RAINFALL PARAMETERS INFLUENCING EROSIVITY IN SOUTHEASTERN NIGERIA [J].
OBI, ME ;
SALAKO, FK .
CATENA, 1995, 24 (04) :275-287