Longitudinal association of glucose metabolism with retinopathy - Results from the Australian Diabetes Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study

被引:83
作者
Tapp, Robyn J. [1 ,2 ]
Tikellis, Gabriella [3 ]
Wong, Tien Y. [1 ,3 ]
Harper, C. Alex [3 ]
Zimmet, Paul Z. [1 ,2 ]
Shaw, Jonathan E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Int Diabet Inst, Caulfield, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Eye Res Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.2337/dc07-1707
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - We determined the longitudinal association of glucose metabolism with retinopathy in a sample of the Australian population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The Australian Diabetes Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study is a national, longitudinal study of adults aged >= 25 years from 42 randomly selected areas of Australia. Retinopathy was assessed at baseline in 1999-2000 and 5 years later in 2004-2005 in participants identified as having diabetes (based on self-report and oral glucose tolerance test) and impaired glucose metabolism and in a random sample with normal glucose tolerance. Complete retinal data were available for 1,192 participants. Photographs were graded at two time points according to a simplified version of the Wisconsin grading system. RESULTS - The 5-year incidences of retinopathy were 13.9 and 3.0% among those with known and newly diagnosed diabetes at baseline, respectively. Of those who developed incident newly diagnosed diabetes at follow-up, 11.9% had retinopathy at baseline compared with 5.6% of those who did not progress to incident newly diagnosed diabetes (P = 0.037). After adjustment for factors identified as risk factors for diabetes, individuals with retinopathy signs at baseline were twice as likely to develop incident newly diagnosed diabetes compared with those who did not have retinopathy signs at baseline. CONCLUSIONS - The 5-year incidence of retinopathy was 13.9% among individuals with known diabetes. Nondiabetic individuals with retinopathy signs at baseline had a twofold higher risk of developing incident newly diagnosed diabetes 5 years later. This result provides further evidence that mild retinopathy signs may be a preclinical marker of underlying microvascular disease and future diabetes risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1354
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ALDINGTON SJ, 1995, DIABETOLOGIA, V38, P437, DOI 10.1007/BF00410281
[2]   Untreated hypertension among Australian adults: the 1999-2000 Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab) [J].
Briganti, EM ;
Shaw, JE ;
Chadban, SJ ;
Zimmet, PZ ;
Welborn, TA ;
McNeil, JJ ;
Atkins, RC .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 179 (03) :135-139
[3]   Five-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy in a defined older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study [J].
Cikamatana, L. ;
Mitchell, P. ;
Rochtchina, E. ;
Foran, S. ;
Wang, J. J. .
EYE, 2007, 21 (04) :465-471
[4]   Five-year incidence and progression of vascular retinopathy in persons without diabetes: the Blue Mountains Eye Study [J].
Cugati, S. ;
Cikamatana, L. ;
Wang, J. J. ;
Kifley, A. ;
Liew, G. ;
Mitchell, P. .
EYE, 2006, 20 (11) :1239-1245
[5]   Do retinopathy signs in non-diabetic individuals predict the subsequent risk of diabetes? [J].
Cugati, S. ;
Mitchell, P. ;
Wang, J. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 90 (07) :928-929
[6]  
Klein R, 1997, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V95, P329
[7]  
Klein R, 1997, T AM OPHTHAL SOC, V95, P348
[8]  
Klein Ronald, 2006, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V104, P98
[9]   Incidence of diabetic retinopathy in the Barbados Eye Studies [J].
Leske, MC ;
Wu, SY ;
Hennis, A ;
Nemesure, B ;
Hyman, L ;
Schachat, A .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (05) :941-947
[10]   The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: A comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography [J].
Lin, DY ;
Blumenkranz, MS ;
Brothers, RJ ;
Grosvenor, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 134 (02) :204-213