Transcranial Electric Stimulation Entrains Cortical Neuronal Populations in Rats

被引:291
作者
Ozen, Simal [1 ]
Sirota, Anton [1 ,2 ]
Belluscio, Mariano A. [1 ]
Anastassiou, Costas A. [3 ,4 ]
Stark, Eran [1 ]
Koch, Christof [3 ,5 ]
Buzsaki, Gyoergy [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Mol & Behav Neurosci, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[2] Univ Tubingen, Ctr Integrat Neurosci, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[3] CALTECH, Div Biol, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Bioengn, London SW7 2AZ, England
[5] Korea Univ, Dept Brain & Cognit Engn, Seoul 136701, South Korea
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; EPILEPTIFORM ACTIVITY; STOCHASTIC RESONANCE; NEOCORTICAL NEURONS; HIPPOCAMPAL SLICES; RECURRENT ACTIVITY; FIELD POTENTIALS; HUMAN BRAIN; IN-VITRO;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5252-09.2010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Low intensity electric fields have been suggested to affect the ongoing neuronal activity in vitro and in human studies. However, the physiological mechanism of how weak electrical fields affect and interact with intact brain activity is not well understood. We performed in vivo extracellular and intracellular recordings from the neocortex and hippocampus of anesthetized rats and extracellular recordings in behaving rats. Electric fields were generated by sinusoid patterns at slow frequency (0.8, 1.25 or 1.7 Hz) via electrodes placed on the surface of the skull or the dura. Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) reliably entrained neurons in widespread cortical areas, including the hippocampus. The percentage of TES phase-locked neurons increased with stimulus intensity and depended on the behavioral state of the animal. TES-induced voltage gradient, as low as 1 mV/mm at the recording sites, was sufficient to phase-bias neuronal spiking. Intracellular recordings showed that both spiking and subthreshold activity were under the combined influence of TES forced fields and network activity. We suggest that TES in chronic preparations may be used for experimental and therapeutic control of brain activity.
引用
收藏
页码:11476 / 11485
页数:10
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   TISSUE INTERACTIONS WITH NONIONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS [J].
ADEY, WR .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1981, 61 (02) :435-514
[2]   The Effect of Spatially Inhomogeneous Extracellular Electric Fields on Neurons [J].
Anastassiou, Costas A. ;
Montgomery, Sean M. ;
Barahona, Mauricio ;
Buzsaki, Gyoergy ;
Koch, Christof .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (05) :1925-1936
[3]  
BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
[4]   Characterization of neocortical principal cells and Interneurons by network interactions and extracellular features [J].
Barthó, P ;
Hirase, H ;
Monconduit, L ;
Zugaro, M ;
Harris, KD ;
Buzsáki, G .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 92 (01) :600-608
[5]   INFLUENCES OF SINUSOIDAL ELECTRIC-FIELDS ON EXCITABILITY IN THE RAT HIPPOCAMPAL SLICE [J].
BAWIN, SM ;
SHEPPARD, AR ;
MAHONEY, MD ;
ADEY, WR .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1984, 323 (02) :227-237
[6]   Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space [J].
Bédard, C ;
Kröger, H ;
Destexhe, A .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (03) :1829-1842
[7]   Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type [J].
Bi, GQ ;
Poo, MM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 18 (24) :10464-10472
[8]   Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro [J].
Bikson, M ;
Inoue, M ;
Akiyama, H ;
Deans, JK ;
Fox, JE ;
Miyakawa, H ;
Jefferys, JGR .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2004, 557 (01) :175-190
[9]   THE EFFECTS OF POLARIZING CURRENTS ON CELL POTENTIALS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE IN THE INTERPRETATION OF CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM ACTIVITY [J].
BISHOP, GH ;
OLEARY, JL .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1950, 2 (04) :401-416
[10]   Transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation compared: Does TES activate intracortical neuronal circuits? [J].
Brocke, J ;
Irlbacher, K ;
Hauptmann, B ;
Voss, M ;
Brandt, SA .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 116 (12) :2748-2756