Cost-benefit analysis of a strategy to vaccinate healthy working adults against influenza

被引:172
作者
Nichol, KL
机构
[1] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Med Serv 111, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
[2] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Ctr Chron Dis Outcomes Res, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.161.5.749
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Influenza is a major cause of illness, disruption to daily life, and work absenteeism among healthy working adults aged between 18 and 64 years. This group is not included among the traditional priority groups for annual vaccination. Immunization rates remain low. Objective: To assess the economic implications of a strategy for annual vaccination of this group. Methods: Using the societal perspective, this cost benefit analysis included the direct and indirect costs associated with vaccination as well as the direct and indirect costs prevented by vaccination. Clinical and economic variable estimates were derived primarily from the published literature. For this model, it was assumed that vaccination occurred in efficient, low-cost settings such as at the work site. Monte Carlo simulation was used to calculate the mean net costs or savings along with the 95% probability interval, and sensitivity analyses explored the sensitivity of the cost model to different values of the input variables. Results: Vaccinating healthy working adults was on average cost saving, with mean savings of $13.66 per person vaccinated (95% probability interval: net savings of $32.97 to net costs of $2.18), with vaccination generating net savings 95% of the time. The model was most sensitive to the influenza illness rate, the work absenteeism rate due to influenza, and hourly wages. In the worst-case scenario vaccination was not cost saving. Vaccination also generated net costs to society during years with a poor vaccine-circulating virus strain match. In all of the other sensitivity analysis scenarios, vaccination was cost saving. Conclusion: Influenza vaccination of healthy working adults on average is cost saving. These findings support a strategy of routine, annual vaccination for this group, especially when vaccination occurs in efficient and low cost sites.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 759
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTHC RES QU, 1999, NAT INP SAMPL HLTHC
[3]  
Benson V.M., 1998, CURRENT ESTIMATES NA
[4]   Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Bridges, CB ;
Thompson, WW ;
Meltzer, MI ;
Reeve, GR ;
Talamonti, WJ ;
Cox, NJ ;
Lilac, HA ;
Hall, H ;
Klimov, A ;
Fukuda, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (13) :1655-1663
[5]  
*BUR LAB STAT DAT, 1999, CONS PRIC IND ALL IT
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in a healthy, working-age population [J].
Campbell, DS ;
Rumley, MH .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1997, 39 (05) :408-414
[7]  
Centers for disease control and prevention, 1999, BEH RISK FACT SURV S
[8]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V49, P888
[9]  
COLLINS SD, 1953, PUBLIC HLTH MONOGRAP, V1, P1
[10]   INFLUENZA - ITS CONTROL IN PERSONS AND POPULATIONS [J].
COUCH, RB ;
KASEL, JA ;
GLEZEN, WP ;
CATE, TR ;
SIX, HR ;
TABER, LH ;
FRANK, AL ;
GREENBERG, SB ;
ZAHRADNIK, JM ;
KEITEL, WA .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1986, 153 (03) :431-440