Feasibility first: Developing public performance indicators on patient safety and clinical effectiveness for Dutch hospitals

被引:73
作者
Berg, M [1 ]
Meijerink, Y
Gras, M
Goossensen, A
Schellekens, W
Haeck, J
Kallewaard, M
Kingma, H
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] CBO, Dutch Hlth Care Improvement Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Hlth Care Inspectorate, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
public performance indicators; patient safety; clinical effectiveness; Dutch hospitals;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.02.007
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper describes the development and implementation of the first national, public and obligatory set of hospital performance indicators in the Netherlands. Focusing on effectiveness and safety, the set was developed by the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of their task: monitoring the quality of the care delivered by providers. In addition, the set would enhance the transparency of the hospital sector, and stimulate individual hospitals to improve their scores. Bridging some of the classic distinctions between 'internal' and 'external' indicators, the Inspectorate's vision was to rapidly produce a feasible set of indicators that would fulfill these aims, while maximally preventing 'side effects' such as misinterpretations, defensive or perverse reactions. Explicitly avoiding the trap of searching for exhaustive validity of the indicators, the inspectorate's motto was 'feasability first'. This paper describes how this simultaneously philosophical, political and pragmatic strategy played out successfully, and how the indicator set was ultimately embraced by all parties involved. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 73
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Appleby J, 2000, BRIT MED J, V321, P266
[2]   Quality based social insurance coverage and payment of the application of a high cost medical therapy: the case of spinal cord stimulation for chronic non-oncologic pain in The Netherlands [J].
Beersen, N ;
Redekop, WK ;
de Bruijn, JHB ;
Theuvenet, PJ ;
Berg, M ;
Klazinga, NS .
HEALTH POLICY, 2005, 71 (01) :107-115
[3]   The contextual nature of medical information [J].
Berg, M ;
Goorman, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1999, 56 (1-3) :51-60
[4]   Guidelines, professionals and the production of objectivity: standardisation and the professionalism of insurance medicine [J].
Berg, M ;
Horstman, K ;
Plass, S ;
van Heusden, M .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2000, 22 (06) :765-791
[5]   Developing and testing changes in delivery of care [J].
Berwick, DM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 128 (08) :651-656
[6]   Looking forward - The NHS: Feeling well and thriving at 75 [J].
Berwick, DM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7150) :57-61
[7]  
Berwick DM, 2003, MED CARE, V41, pI30
[8]   Public performance reports and the will for change [J].
Berwick, DM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (12) :1523-1524
[9]   Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Stukel, TA ;
Siewers, AE ;
Goodney, PP ;
Wennberg, DE ;
Lucas, FL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (22) :2117-2127
[10]  
Carter N., 1992, ORG MEASURE SUCCESS